Skip navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Food Safety
    • Recalls & Public Health Alerts
      • Report a Problem with Food
        • Additional Recalls
      • Annual Recall Summaries
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2012
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2013
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2014
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2015
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2016
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2017
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2018
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2019
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2020
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2021
        • Summary of Recall and PHA Cases in Calendar Year 2022
    • Food Safety Stats
      • Consumer Research
    • Foodborne Illness and Disease
      • Illnesses and Pathogens
        • Campylobacter
          • Campylobacter En Español
        • Clostridium botulinum
        • Escherichia coli O157:H7
        • Parasites and Foodborne Illness
        • Salmonella Questions and Answers
      • Resources for Public Health Partners
        • State Departments of Public Health
      • Outbreaks
        • Outbreak Investigations: Prevention
        • Outbreak Investigations: Response
    • Safe Food Handling and Preparation
      • Food Safety Basics
        • Additives in Meat and Poultry Products
        • Appliance Thermometers
        • Asar a la parrilla y seguridad alimentaria
        • Cleanliness Helps Prevent Foodborne Illness
        • Cooking for Groups
        • Cooking with Microwave Ovens
        • Cutting Boards
        • Deep Fat Frying
        • Doneness Versus Safety
        • Food Allergies
        • Glossary of Packaging Terms
        • Grilling Food Safely
        • Grilling and Food Safety
        • High Altitude Cooking
        • How Temperatures Affect Food
        • How to Find the USDA Establishment Number
        • Importing Meat, Poultry & Egg Products US
        • Inspection for Food Safety: The Basics
        • Irradiation and Food Safety FAQ
        • Keeping "Bag" Lunches Safe
        • Keeping Food Safe During an Emergency
        • Kitchen Thermometers
        • Mail Order Food Safety
        • Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms
        • Meat and Poultry Packaging Materials
        • Natural Flavors on Meat and Poultry Labels
        • Safe Handling of Take-Out Foods
        • Slaughter Inspection 101
        • Slow Cookers and Food Safety
        • Smoking Meat and Poultry
        • Tailgating Food Safety Q & A
        • Understanding FSIS Food Recalls
        • Water in Meat & Poultry
        • Danger Zone 40F - 140F
        • Food Product Dating
        • Freezing and Food Safety
        • Leftovers and Food Safety
        • Molds on Food: Are They Dangerous?
          • Hongos en los Alimentos: ¿Son Peligrosos?
        • Refrigeration
        • Safe Temperature Chart
        • Shelf-Stable Food
        • Steps to Keep Food Safe
        • The Big Thaw — Safe Defrosting Methods
        • The Color of Meat and Poultry
        • Washing Food: Does it Promote Food Safety?
        • Food Safety While Hiking, Camping & Boating
        • Seguridad Alimentaria Durante Caminatas, Campamentos y Paseos en Bote
      • Meat
        • Bacon and Food Safety
        • Bagre de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Beef From Farm To Table
        • Bison from Farm to Table
        • Carne de res ablandada mecánicamente
        • Catfish from Farm to Table
        • Color of Cooked Ground Beef as It Relates to Doneness
        • Corned Beef
        • Door-to-Door Meat Sales
        • Fresh Pork from Farm to Table
        • Goat from Farm to Table
        • Ground Beef and Food Safety
        • Hams and Food Safety
        • Hot Dogs & Food Safety
        • Jerky
        • Lamb From Farm to Table
        • Mechanically Tenderized Beef
        • Rabbit From Farm to Table
        • Roasting Those "Other" Holiday Meats
        • Sausages and Food Safety
        • Veal from Farm to Table
        • Yersiniosis and Chitterlings Tips
      • Poultry
        • Chicken From Farm to Table
        • Chicken Liver
        • Duck and Goose from Farm to Table
        • Hock Locks and Other Accoutrements
        • Is Pink Turkey Meat Safe?
        • Let's Talk Turkey Roasting
        • Poultry Processing: Questions & Answers
        • Poultry: Basting, Brining, and Marinating
        • Stuffing and Food Safety
        • The Poultry Label Says "Fresh"
        • Turduckens Require Safe Food Handling
        • Turkey Basics: Handling Cooked Dinners
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Cooking
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Thawing
        • Turkey Basics: Stuffing
        • Turkey from Farm to Table
        • Turkey: Alternate Routes to the Table
      • Eggs
        • Egg Products and Food Safety
        • Shell Eggs from Farm to Table
      • Emergencies
        • A Consumer's Guide to Food Safety: Severe Storms and Hurricanes
        • Fires and Food Safety
        • Keep Your Food Safe During Emergencies
        • Removing Odors from Refrigerators and Freezers
      • USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline
      • Brochures & Publications
    • Food Defense and Emergency Response
      • Emergency Response
      • Continuity of Operations (COOP)
      • Food Defense
        • Risk Mitigation Tool
        • Food Defense Considerations for Transportation of FSIS-Regulated Products
        • Food Defense Tools, Resources and Training
        • Functional Food Defense Plans
        • International Food Defense
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
          • Tables & Results Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat
          • Tables & Results: Microbiological Testing Program Pasteurized Egg Products
          • Aggregate Salmonella Categorization of Raw Chicken Parts, NRTE Comminuted Poultry, Young Chicken Carcass and Young Turkey Carcass Establishments Using Moving Windows
          • Salmonella Initiative Program Criteria
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Antimicrobial Resistance
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Raw Beef Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Ready-to-eat Products and Egg Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Salmonella
            • Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update
            • Salmonella Categorization of Individual Establishments for Poultry Products
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
          • Year-to-Date Totals: Testing of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)
          • Annual Report for STEC in Raw Ground Beef or Veal and Raw Ground Beef or Veal Components
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2017
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2018
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2016
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2015
          • Year-to-Date 2018 Totals: Results of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC):
        • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Chemical Residues and Contaminants
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • Journal Publications
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
  • Inspection
    • Inspection Programs
      • Inspection of Meat Products
        • Humane Handling Ombudsman
        • Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Poultry Products
        • Reducing Salmonella in Poultry
          • Pilot Projects: Salmonella Control Strategies
          • Proposed Regulatory Framework to Reduce Salmonella Illnesses Attributable to Poultry
            • Component 1
            • Component 2
            • Component 3
          • Salmonella By the Numbers
          • Salmonella KPI
          • Salmonella Risk Assessments
        • Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Egg Products
      • Inspection of Siluriformes
    • Compliance Guidance
      • Significant Guidance
      • HACCP
        • HACCP-Based-Inspection Models Project
          • New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS)
          • HIMP Redesign Achievement of Performance Standards Young Chicken Plants
          • List of HIMP Participating Plants
        • HACCP Validation
      • PHIS
        • PHIS: Historical Information
      • Retail Guidance
      • Small & Very Small Plant Guidance
        • Appealing Inspection Decisions
        • Food Safety Resources for Small and Very Small Plant Outreach: Order Form
        • Small Plant Help Desk
        • Small Plant Help Desk Form
      • Microbial Risk
        • Listeria Monocytogenes
        • Salmonella
        • Shiga Toxin-Producing E.Coli (STEC) and E. Coli O157:H7
        • Specified Risk Material
          • BSE Rules Being Strictly Enforced
        • Guidance for Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens - Best Practice Tips for Deli Operators
      • Specified Risk Material Resources
      • Food Safety Assessments Tools
      • Recall Process
      • Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide
      • Labeling
        • Basics of Labeling
        • Claims Guidance
        • Nonfood Compounds
          • Compounds Used for Construction and Repair in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Plants
          • Criteria Used by the Former Compounds and Packaging Branch for Evaluating Nonfood Compounds and Proprietary Substances
        • Ingredients Guidance
        • Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
          • Integration of Paper Label Applications into the Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
        • Labeling Policies
          • Human Food Made with Cultured Animal Cells
          • Regulations for Package Dating
          • Comprehensive List of Reasons for Label Modifications and Returns
        • Labeling Procedures
          • Information Required For Requesting a Temporary Approval
          • 10 Most Common Mistakes And How to Avoid Them
          • Label Submission Checklist
          • Labeling Situations That Can Not Have a Temporary Approval
          • Labeling and Establishment Responsibilities
          • Ten Most Commonly Asked Labeling Questions
          • Trans Fat Declarations in the Nutrition Facts Panel on Product Labeling
      • New Technology
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2003
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2004
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2005
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2003
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2004
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2005
        • NOL for Non-O157 STEC Test Methods
        • New Technology Information Table
      • Humane Handling
    • Import & Export
      • Import & Export Library
        • Eligible Foreign Establishments
        • U.S. Establishments by Country
          • Australia Eligible Establishments
          • Brazil Export Eligible Establishments
          • Egypt Export Eligible Establishments
          • Gibraltar Export Eligible Establishments
          • Israel Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Casings) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Cold Storage Facilities) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Mexico Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Beef) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Pork) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Poultry) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Prepared Products) Export Eligible Establishments
          • South Africa Eligible Establishments
      • Import Guidance
        • FSIS Import Procedures for Meat, Poultry & Egg Products
        • FSIS Import Reinspection
        • Sourcing Egg Products and Shell Eggs From Foreign Countries
      • Export Guidance
      • Equivalence
      • PHIS Components
      • International Reports
        • Foreign Audit Reports
        • Import and Export Data
    • Regulatory Enforcement
      • Humane Handling Enforcement
      • Quarterly Enforcement Reports
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v1)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v2)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v3)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v4)
      • FSIS Policies on Regulatory Decisions
    • Inspection Training & Videos
      • Inspection & Mission Training
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Videos
      • Regulatory Education Video Seminars
    • Apply for Grant of Inspection
      • Grants & Financial Options
    • State Inspection Programs
      • Cooperative Interstate Shipping Program
        • Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) Establishments
      • Guidance Documents for State and Local Agencies
      • States With and Without Inspection Programs
      • Reviews of State Programs
    • Establishments
      • FSIS Inspected Establishments
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Directory
    • Inspection Forms
  • About FSIS
    • History
    • Leadership & Organizational Structure
    • Strategic Planning
      • FSIS Enterprise Governance Decision Making Process
    • Core Values
    • Food Safety & Agency Partners
      • Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
    • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
      • FSIS Adjudications
      • FSIS FOIA Reading Room
      • Frequently Requested Records
      • Making a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request
    • Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
  • Contact Us
    • FSIS Offices
      • Office for Food Safety (OFS)
      • Office of the Administrator (OA)
      • Office of Field Operations (OFO)
      • Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit (OIEA)
      • Office of Public Health Science (OPHS)
      • Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD)
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)
      • Office of International Coordination (OIC)
      • Office of Employee Experience and Development (OEED)
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
      • Office of Management (OM)
      • Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE)
      • Internal Affairs (IA)
      • Office of Planning Analysis Risk Management (OPARM)
      • Civil Rights Staff
    • FSIS Department Emails
    • State Contacts
    • askFSIS
      • Having Trouble with the Webform
    • Pregúntele a Karen
  • Careers
    • Apply for a Job
    • Job Opportunities
    • Who Works for Us
      • Dr. Summer Addo — an Unexpected Career Path
      • Dr. Jeanetta Tankson Shares Her Passion for Science and Food Safety
      • Micheall Myrie - Visual Information Specialist and AAFE Award Winner
      • DDM Jeffery Jacobsen Ensures Meat is Safe and Cooks it, Too!
      • CSI Sherri Rodriguez: Thankful for FSIS and Friends
      • Stephen Whatley Celebrates 50 Years of Federal Service
      • Stevie Hretz Enjoys Putting “Humans First!”
      • Archives
    • Career Profiles
      • Administrative Positions
      • Compliance Investigator Positions
      • Consumer Safety Inspector
      • Food Inspector
      • Professional Positions
      • Public Health Veterinarian (PHV)
      • Scientific Positions
    • Incentives
      • Federal Employee Benefits Summary
    • Employment Programs
    • Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs
    • Professionals with Disabilities
  • News & Events
    • Events & Meetings
      • Officials' Calendar of Meetings
      • Food Safety Education Month
    • News & Press Releases
      • News Feeds & Subscriptions
    • Publications
    • Branding & Toolkits
  • Employees
    • HR Policies & Systems
      • Forms
      • Performance Management
      • Understanding Your Benefits
        • Emergency Backup Dependent Care (EBDC) Program
    • FSIS Safety
      • COVID-19 Pandemic Resources
        • Information about Face Coverings/Masks and Face Shields
      • Workplace Violence
    • Onboarding
      • New Hire Training
    • Agency Awards & Achievements
    • Professional Development Opportunities
      • OFO Workforce Investment Initiative Pilot Program
    • Employee News & Stories
      • FSIS Snapshots
        • March 2023 Snapshots
        • February 2023 Snapshots
        • January 2023 Snapshots
        • December 2022 Snapshots
        • September 2022 Snapshots
        • August 2022 Snapshots
        • November 2022 Snapshots
        • July 2022 Snapshots
        • October 2022 Snapshots
        • June 2022 Snapshots
        • May 2022 Snapshots
        • April 2022 Snapshots
        • March 2022 Snapshots
        • February 2022 Snapshots
        • January 2022 Snapshots
        • December 2021 Snapshots
        • November 2021 Snapshots
        • October 2021 Snapshots
        • September 2021 Snapshots
        • August 2021 Snapshots
        • July 2021 Snapshots
        • June 2021 Snapshots
      • Submit Your Stories
      • Black History Month — Resistance Through Agricultural Innovations
      • Tiffanie Newman: Versatility at FSIS and in Daily Life
      • Meet Pickle-Eating Champ, CSI Joe Smith
      • Supervisors Make All the Difference!
      • Disability: Part of the Equity Equation
      • Archives
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month - Cyber Security for Remote Work
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Occupant Emergency Planning
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Women’s Equality Day
        • ARCHIVE: Managing Heat Risk in Hot Weather
        • ARCHIVE: New Netflix Show Features USDA and FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month — Advancing Leaders Through Collaboration
        • ARCHIVE: Thank You for Your Public Service
        • ARCHIVE: World Veterinary Day — Recognizing the Resilience of FSIS Veterinarians
        • ARCHIVE: Two Hero Inspectors Provide Potentially Life-Saving CPR to a Plant Employee
        • ARCHIVE: Hero Inspector Saves a Life While on the Road
        • ARCHIVE: Administrative Professionals Day — Thank You
        • ARCHIVE: Chief Information Security Officer Marvin Lykes Recognized for Operational Excellence
        • ARCHIVE: Women’s History Month: Women Providing Healing, Promoting Hope
        • ARCHIVE: Alameda District Awards Petaluma Circuit Inspectors Recognition Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Collaborating in the Caribbean — Bringing Awareness About African Swine Fever
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Be an Advocate for Public Health
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
        • ARCHIVE: In Their Own Words: The 2021 Administrator’s Awards for Excellence Winners Speak Out
        • ARCHIVE: CSI Koffi Hoenou – From Togolese Teacher to U.S. Citizen
        • ARCHIVE: Dearborn, Mich., Circuit Inspectors Receive Collaborative Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Don’t Invite Foodborne Illness to the Party
        • ARCHIVE: Inspection for Ritual Meat and Poultry Slaughter
        • ARCHIVE: Thanksgiving Message from Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Make a Difference for You and Your Colleagues – Respond to FEVS by Dec. 3
        • ARCHIVE: American Indian/Alaskan Native Heritage Month — Together Towards Tomorrow
        • ARCHIVE: Federal State Audit Staff Twice Honored for Supporting Military Staff
        • ARCHIVE: Veterans Day Messages from FSIS Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs for Veterans
        • ARCHIVE: Disability Employment Awareness Month — America’s Recovery: Powered by Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Helping Today’s Inspectors Be Tomorrow’s Leaders with Tuition Reimbursement
        • ARCHIVE: Dr. Geraldine Vidal-Covas Embraces Her Hispanic Heritage, Encourages All
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month – Home Go Kits & Pets
        • ARCHIVE: Mask Requirements Updated for FSIS Employees
        • ARCHIVE: Modernizing Egg Inspection
        • ARCHIVE: FSIS Recognized Twice for 2020 Food Safety Education Efforts
        • ARCHIVE: Four Steps to Good Mental Health
        • ARCHIVE: Building Relationships at Work
        • ARCHIVE: Pride Month and USDA’s Commitment to Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Honoring the Dedicated Public Servants of FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American and Pacific Islander Contributions to Our Nation’s History
        • ARCHIVE: USDA Vaccination Heroes Do Their Part for America
        • ARCHIVE: Remembering Their Sacrifice: Jean Hillery, Tom Quadros and Bill Shaline
    • Facilities and Services
    • Employee Bargaining
    • Civil Rights

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • About FSIS
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Employees
  • Food Safety
  • Science & Data
  • Policy
  • Inspection
  • Recalls
  • Search
  • Full Menu
ALERT: Elkhorn Valley Packing Recalls Boneless… See more details
Page Hero
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
Subscribe for Updates
Ask FSIS

askFSIS

Find answers to questions on inspection-related policies, programs, systems, and procedures.
Find An Answer
Document in circle icon

Participate in Creating Standards

FSIS invites the food safety community to participate in establishing standards for our food safety policies and services. Join us for public meetings or respond to comment requests.
Learn More

FSIS Verification Testing of Domestic Egg Products

FSIS directive 10230.3
Series Type 10,000 Series: Laboratory Services
Issue Date Dec 21, 2020
Full Directive
10230.3.pdf

DO NOT IMPLEMENT THIS DIRECTIVE UNTIL DECEMBER 28, 2020.

I. PURPOSE

This directive provides instructions to inspection program personnel (IPP) for the collection and submission of pasteurized dried, frozen, and liquid egg products under FSIS’s routine sampling programs for Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes (Lm). It also includes instructions for the collection of raw or pasteurized liquid and dried egg products for chemical residue testing. This directive provides instructions previously included in FSIS notices. In addition, this directive replaces the regulatory citations from those notices to reflect the Egg Products Regulations Inspection rule issued on October 29, 2020. These revised regulatory citations will go in effect on December 28, 2020.

II. BACKGROUND

A. FSIS considers pasteurized egg products ready-to-eat (RTE) because they do not require additional preparation to ensure food safety. To verify that pasteurized egg products are safe and wholesome, FSIS analyzes them for the presence of Salmonella and Lm. Plants are required to hold or control products pending the receipt of Salmonella and Lm test results (9 CFR 590.504(e)).

B. FSIS analyzes samples of liquid or dried egg products for violative chemical residues of veterinary drugs, pesticides, or environmental contaminants. A violation occurs when a chemical residue is detected and exceeds the established tolerance or action level or when FSIS detects the residue when there is no tolerance or action level. FSIS recommends that egg products plants hold or maintain control of sampled egg products until FSIS residue sample results are found to be acceptable, but FSIS does not require that plants hold or control these products pending the receipt of residue test results.

III. SAMPLING FREQUENCIES

A. FSIS samples egg products for microbiological contamination (Salmonella and Lm) under two sampling codes. The project code “EGG_LQ_MIC01” pertains to frozen and liquid pasteurized egg products. The project code “EGG_DY_MIC01” pertains to dried egg products. Each month, samples are assigned based on the plant’s monthly production volume (calculated from the average daily production and days of production provided in the Public Health Information System (PHIS) Establishment Profile). If a plant produces both liquid/frozen and dried egg products, the plant’s total sample allocation will be divided between both project codes.

B. FSIS samples egg products for residues under the project code “NRP_EG.” The frequency of residue sampling tasks may vary from year to year. Information on egg product residue analyses and the annual sampling plan is provided in the FSIS Annual Sampling Plan.

IV. GENERAL SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS

A. Before collecting samples, IPP are to be familiar with the random sampling methodology, which may include the use of random number tables or using computer generated random numbers. There is a random-number generator available on FSIS computers (Start Menu à FSIS Applications à Tools à Random Number Generator). When collecting a sample, IPP are to randomly select a day, shift, and time within the collection date range (sampling window) indicated in PHIS. IPP are to collect samples from all shifts at the plant, so that there is an equal chance that sampling will occur during any particular shift.

B. If an egg products plant produces more than one product group, IPP are to randomly select the egg product group to sample and then rotate through the different formulations with each sampling task so that all formulations are sampled over time.

C. IPP are to refer to FSIS Directive 13,000.2, Performing Sampling Tasks in Official Establishments Using the Public Health Information System, for instructions on how to add a sampling task to the task calendar, enter the sample information into PHIS, submit the sample information to the laboratory, and print a finalized sample collection form from PHIS.

D. IPP are to schedule and collect samples as assigned in PHIS. IPP have 30 days from the date of the sample request (sample collection window) to collect the sample and submit it to the FSIS laboratory.

E. If sampling tasks remain in the task list at the end of the sampling window, IPP are to cancel them from the task list and provide the appropriate reason.

  1. If a plant produces a product that is eligible for sampling but is not producing that product during the sampling window, IPP are to select “requested sample unavailable during the sampling timeframe.”
  2. If the plant has never produced the product or discontinues producing an eligible product, IPP are to select “requested sample/product never slaughtered/produced.” Because sampling tasks are assigned based on the information provided in the Establishment Profile, IPP are to verify that the Establishment Profile in PHIS accurately represents the plant’s operations and product groups. This includes product volumes and days of production to ensure that the correct number of sampling tasks is assigned. IPP are to refer to FSIS Directive 5300.1, Managing the Establishment Profile in the Public Health Information System, for instructions on managing the Establishment Profile.
  3. If the appropriate reason for cancellation is not available, IPP are to select “Other” and clearly specify the reason for the cancellation.

E. For microbiological analyses, IPP are to be aware that plants are required to hold or control the lot(s) of egg products represented by the samples until FSIS Salmonella and Lm sample results are found to be acceptable. If product is shipped from a plant prior to receiving the results, shipments must be made under circumstances which will ensure the return of the product to the plant (9 CFR 590.504(e)). If the plant has not notified the receiving company that laboratory results were pending at the time of shipment, the plant is in violation of the Egg Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1031 et seq.). IPP are to issue a noncompliance citing 9 CFR 590.504(e).

F. For FSIS residue analysis, IPP are to be aware that egg products plants are NOT required to hold or control the lot(s) of egg products represented by the samples until FSIS sample results are found to be acceptable; however, IPP are to recommend that establishments hold or control the lots represented by these samples. If violative levels of residue are detected, then appropriate disposition of the product may include destruction of the lot represented by the sample.

V. SAMPLING SUPPLIES

A. Microbiological sampling supplies will be automatically returned to the plant after each sample is received by the laboratory. However, if IPP need to request additional sampling supplies, they are to follow the instructions provided in FSIS Directive 13,000.2 for ordering sampling supplies through PHIS. IPP may also submit requests for sampling supplies via e-mail using the following e-mail addresses:

FSIS - Sampling Supplies - Midwestern Lab (SamplingSupplies-MidwesternLab@usda.gov);
FSIS - Sampling Supplies - Eastern Lab (SamplingSupplies-EasternLab@usda.gov); or
FSIS - Sampling Supplies - Western Lab (SamplingSupplies-WesternLab@usda.gov)

To request sampling supplies by e-mail, IPP are to enter “Egg Products Sampling Supplies” in the e-mail subject heading and, in the e-mail body, include the plant name and number, the project code (EGG_LQ_MIC01 and/or EGG_DY_MIC01), and the IPP contact name and telephone number.

B. Residue sampling supplies are not sent automatically. IPP are to request sampling supplies at least three business days before sampling is to begin. IPP are to follow the instructions provided in FSIS Directive 13,000.2 for ordering sampling supplies through PHIS. IPP may also submit requests for sampling supplies to the Western Laboratory (WL) via e-mail using the following e-mail address:

FSIS - Sampling Supplies - Western Lab (SamplingSupplies-WesternLab@usda.gov)

To request sampling supplies by e-mail, IPP are to enter “Egg Products Sampling Supplies” in the e-mail subject heading and, in the e-mail body, include the plant name and number, the project code (NRP_EG), and the IPP contact name and telephone number.

C. For the EGG_LQ_MIC01 (liquid or frozen products) project code, sampling supplies do not include a ladle. If a ladle is required for aseptic sample collection where a valve is not present, IPP are to request a ladle. The request for a ladle is to be included in the comment section of the dialog box when using PHIS, or in the body of the email when using the laboratory mailing list. The shipping container for the EGG_LQ_MIC01 project code should include the following sampling supplies:

  1. Pair of gloves (1);
  2. 120-ml sterile plastic sample jars with screw cap (2);
  3. 1-gallon zipper lock bag (1);
  4. Plastic sleeve or zipper lock bag for sample form (FSIS form 8000-18) (1);
  5. FSIS Laboratory Sample Container Seal (FSIS Form 7355-2A/2B) (1);
  6. Absorbent pad (1);
  7. Gel coolant pack (1 or more);
  8. Cardboard separator (1);
  9. FedEx (pre-printed) billable stamps (3; one per FSIS laboratory for submitting the sample); and
  10. When requested, a ladle.

D. The shipping container for the EGG_DY_MIC01 (dried egg products) project code should include the following sampling supplies:

  1. Pair of gloves (1);
  2. Sterile Whirl-Pak® bag (1);
  3. Sterile scoop (1);
  4. 1-gallon zipper lock bag (1);
  5. Plastic sleeve or zipper lock bag for sample form (FSIS form 8000-18) (1);
  6. FSIS Laboratory Sample Container Seal (FSIS Form 7355-2A/2B) (1);
  7. Absorbent pad (1); and
  8. FedEx (pre-printed) billable stamps (3; one per FSIS laboratory for submitting the sample).

E. For the NRP_EG (either liquid or dried egg product) project code, sampling supplies do not include a sterile scoop or sterile ladle. If a scoop (for dried egg products) or ladle (for collection of liquid egg product where a valve is not present) is needed for aseptic sample collection, IPP are to request the scoop or ladle. The request for a scoop or ladle is to be included in the comment section of the dialog box when using PHIS, or in the body of the email when using the laboratory mailing list. The shipping container for the NRP_EG project code should include the following sampling supplies:

  1. Pair of gloves (1);
  2. 120-ml sterile plastic sample jar with screw cap for liquid egg product (2);
  3. Quart-size sterile resealable zipper lock bag for dried egg product (1);
  4. 1-gallon zipper lock bag (1);

  5. Plastic sleeve or zipper lock bag for sample form (FSIS form 8000-18) (1);

  6. FSIS Laboratory Sample Container Seal (FSIS Form 7355-2A/2B) (1);

  7. Absorbent pad (1);

  8. Gel coolant pack (1 or more);

  9. Cardboard separator (1);

  10. FedEx (pre-printed) billable stamp (1); and

  11. When requested, a ladle or scoop.

F. IPP are to ensure that all the supplies needed for sample collection are inside the box.  If any of the sampling supplies are missing or damaged, IPP are to contact one of the laboratories using the instructions provided in Section V.A. and Section V.B of this directive to request the missing or damaged item(s).

G. IPP are to place the gel coolant pack(s) in a freezer for a minimum of 12 hours prior to sample collection, if collecting liquid or frozen egg products.  Gel packs are not required for dried egg products.

H. FSIS laboratory sampling supplies do not include drills, drill bits, or triers.  If needed, the plant is to provide these items and designate them for sampling only.  These items are not to be used for any other purpose, such as plant maintenance.  IPP are to ensure that the plant thoroughly cleans and sanitizes the drills, drill bits, and triers immediately before and after they are used for sample collection.  While IPP are to operate the plant-provided trier, the plant employees are to operate the drill for sample collection and IPP are to collect the shavings produced.  IPP are to ensure that the drill bit is 11/16 inches or larger in diameter and not less than 12 inches in length.

I. IPP are to use only the shipping materials provided by the FSIS laboratory.

VI.  SAMPLE SELECTION

A.  Before collecting a sample, IPP are to officially notify the plant management that they will be collecting a sample and explain the reason that they are collecting the sample (either microbiological sampling or residue sampling).  Prior to initiating the sampling task, IPP are to:

1. Discuss the plant’s lotting procedures and determine the amount of notice the plant will need prior to collecting these samples.  Generally, IPP are to provide one (1) days’ notice prior to collecting these samples.  IPP may provide two (2) days’ notice if necessary;

2. Consider the plant’s request for more than two days’ notice, in the rare cases that more notice is needed based on the plant’s product and process flow.  If the plant can support that more notice is necessary because of the innate characteristics of the process (e.g., less than daily sanitation, or processes that span more than two days), IPP may provide more than two days’ notice.  If IPP have questions about a plant’s basis for requesting more notice, they are to submit them through askFSIS;

3. Inform the plant that IPP may provide less than one days’ notice if the plant changes its routine practices without a justification for doing so;

4. Discuss where IPP can store the collected sample (see Table 1) until FedEx picks up the sample; and

5. Inform plant management that, if the sample is for microbiological analyses, the plant is required to hold or maintain control of the egg products lot(s) represented by the samples until all FSIS microbiological sample results are found to be acceptable.  If the sample is for residue analysis, recommend that the plant hold or maintain control of the egg products lot(s) represented by the samples until FSIS residue sample results are found to be acceptable; however, IPP are to be aware plants are not required to hold or control product FSIS tests for residues.

B.  The sampled lot is product that is represented by the sample collected by FSIS.  Plants are to define the lot size of their egg products.  If a lot is adulterated due to a pathogen-positive test or violative residue, other lots or other egg products may be affected if the plant is unable to support independence between lots or products.  The sampled lot definition may differ based on microbiological versus chemical analyses.  For microbiological analyses, a typical lot can be defined as one day’s production (physically separated pasteurization run) of each type of product.  A physically separated pasteurization run means that product has been separated from other production lots by cleaning and sanitizing, such that there is no potential contamination between separate lots of product.  This may include cleaning the entire system (pasteurizer, clean-in-place (CIP) lines to packaging room, and final packing/filling equipment).  IPP are to be aware of the following factors or conditions that may determine a sampled lot:

  1. FSIS does not require egg products plants to perform a CIP procedure between each lot of production.  However, if egg products are stored or packaged using common pipelines and equipment that have not been cleaned and sanitized prior to establishing another individual lot, FSIS cannot recognize the product subsequently produced as a separated product lot;
  2. The egg products plant may store multiple lots in a common area.  IPP are to be aware that the plant must maintain sanitary conditions to prevent contamination of the product(s) during storage and consider possible cross-contamination if products from different lots are stored in the same cooler, freezer, or dry egg products cool storage;
  3. IPP are to be aware that a plant may reduce its lot size on a day when FSIS collects a routine egg product sample to facilitate holding the product.  This may be accomplished, for example, through conducting sanitation of all pipelines and equipment between lots;
  4. The egg products plant may define a lot differently based on the product group and formulation.  For example, dried egg whites undergo a heat treatment, rather than a pasteurization run.  In this case, the sampled lot would be all products present in the same heat treatment room at the same time; and
  5. Shared equipment (pasteurizers, piping, silos, packaging machines, etc.) is the primary reason a pathogen-positive lot affects other lots or other “unrelated” egg products. FSIS will consider the following factors to determine products or lots represented by the positive result:

    a. Salmonella is typically found because of underprocessing. If one lot of egg product tests positive by FSIS, then other lots of product receiving the same lethality treatment may also be affected;

    b. The most common cause of contamination by Lm is post lethality cross contamination. If one lot of egg product tests positive by FSIS, then other lots exposed to the same potential cross contamination may be affected; and

    c. In addition, some plants may store more than one lot of pasteurized product in one pasteurized egg product silo without conducting a cleanup between lots.  When this occurs, the sampled lot may consist of all co-mingled pasteurized runs.

C.  For chemical analyses, FSIS considers the sampled lot to represent all products originating from the same poultry farm.  In general, poultry management practices result in the entire flock being treated at the same time rather than individually.  Therefore, an entire flock would be exposed to the same residues.  Most plants will combine eggs from multiple poultry farms into a single production run.  In this case, all poultry farms represented in the sampled lot would be implicated unless the plant provides justification for the exclusion of certain farms.

D.  IPP are to collect microbiological samples from the finished product container (i.e., in its final packaging, typically a carton or pouch).  IPP are to examine the product organoleptically prior to sampling it and are not to sample product that is found unsatisfactory.  Unsatisfactory product includes product that is off-condition (e.g., it contains shell particles, meat, or blood spots) or has an off-odor.  IPP are to refer to FSIS Directive 5030.1, Inspection Methodology Utilizing the Public Health Information System (PHIS) for the Verification of Regulatory Compliance in Egg Products Plants, for instructions on how to handle organoleptically unsatisfactory product.

E.  IPP are to collect residue samples from liquid or dried egg products from shell eggs broken at that plant.  This may include unpasteurized or pasteurized whole eggs, eggs whites, or egg yolks.  Egg products produced from eggs previously broken at another plant are not eligible for residue sampling.  In plants that combine eggs broken at that plant and eggs broken at another plant before pasteurization, IPP are to collect the sample from the collection pot in the breaking room.  This will ensure the collected sample is representative of only the eggs broken in that plant.

F.  IPP are to collect the sample aseptically.  Instructions on aseptic sampling are provided in IPP Help (Start Menu à FSIS Applications à IPP Help) under the “Sampling” tab à “Aseptic Sampling” tab.

VII.  SAMPLE COLLECTION

A.  When sampling liquid egg products, IPP are to:

  1. Randomly select samples in packaging of five pounds or less (e.g., consumer-ready packages, cartons), if available, to achieve a minimum of 200 mL;
  2. If a package of five pounds or less is not available, have the plant short-fill or slack-fill packages in plant-supplied packaging to achieve 200 mL;
  3. If samples are not in consumer-ready packaging (e.g., bulk packaging such as totes, collection pots for residue sampling), IPP are to:

    a. If possible, collect the sample directly from the valve as it pours into bulk packaging;

    b. If not possible, then select a bulk package for sampling;

    c. Gather sampling supplies and proceed to the sampling area;

    d. Prepare the sample container and utensils;

    e. Wash hands and put on gloves;

    f. Asceptically open the bulk package by using a sanitized lid removal tool; and

    g. Fill the two sample jars no more than ¾ full (~ 100 mL in each sample jar for a total volume of 200 mL) to prevent overflow.  Immediately close and seal the sample jar after collecting the sample, taking care not to cross thread the sample jar.
     
  4. When pasteurized egg products are shipped in a tanker to another official plant for further processing, IPP are to:

    a. Gather sampling supplies and proceed to the tanker bay location; and

    b. Observe the plant employee aseptically collect the sample (two sample jars to achieve a total volume of 200 mL) from the tanker and hand the sample to IPP.  IPP are not to collect samples from tankers.  The plant employee will always collect the sample from tankers under the observation of IPP.

B.  When sampling frozen egg products (using a drill or a trier), IPP are to:

  1. Collect the sample during the packaging process and before freezing, if possible.  If this is not possible, try to collect either a final five-pound package or a smaller final size package;
  2. If it is not possible to collect a liquid sample during packaging and before freezing or to collect a final package five pounds or less, then select a bulk package for sampling.  IPP are to:

    a. Gather sampling supplies and proceed to the sampling area;

    b. Prepare the sample container and utensils;

    c. Wash hands and put on gloves;

    d. Asceptically open the bulk package by using a sanitized lid removal tool; and

    e. Fill two sample jars, ensuring both jars are packed down tightly and with no head space.  Filling the jars completely to the top will compensate for the decreased volume that occurs when the product thaws and will ensure enough product is available to conduct the laboratory analyses.
     

  3. When collecting frozen egg product samples using a drill, a designated plant employee will drill the product with a sanitized drill bit and the inspector will aseptically collect shavings and place them into the sample containers.  IPP are to:

    a. Designate where the sample is to be collected, ensuring that the sample will not be collected through the hump that is created due to the freezing process;

    b. Observe plant personnel use a sanitized spoon to remove all frost and ice crystals from the top of the frozen unit to be sampled;

    c. Observe plant personnel drill at approximately a 45-degree angle, starting near the edge of the container;

    d. Verify that plant personnel drill down to within 1 inch of the bottom of the container or, for large containers, as far down as the drill bit can safely go without causing potential product contamination;

    e. Ensure that the shavings do not touch any part of the container that may have been previously exposed to potential contamination;

    f. Ensure that the plant’s drill operator does not spin the drill at high speed, in the hole, to prevent heating of the sample;

    g. Wash and sanitize hands and put on a pair of gloves; 

    h. Collect the shavings that are produced from the drillings, packing the shavings down to ensure that the jar is filled, leaving no head space at the top of the jar; and

    i. Keep the sample frozen at all times.
     

  4. When collecting egg product samples that do not freeze solidly enough to be drilled, e.g., salted or sugared product, IPP are to use a trier (shown at right).  A trier is a tapered plug sampler.  As the trier is twisted into the product, the trough collects a plug of product.  IPP are to insert the sanitized trier fully into the product and twist rapidly to collect the sample.  Aseptically remove the product sample from the trier by scraping the plug from the trier with a sanitized spoon (not included with the sample supplies) and placing it into a sample container.

C. When sampling dried egg products, IPP are to:

  1. Select dried product in final packages for sampling;
  2. If a final package in not available, then select a bulk package for sampling.  Samples are to be collected during packaging, when possible;

    a. Gather sampling supplies and proceed to the sampling area;

    b. Prepare the sample container and utensils;

    c. Wash hands and put on gloves;

    d. Asceptically open the bulk package by using a sanitized lid removal tool;

    e. Open the sterile Whirl-Pak® bags and set aside.  Use a sterile scoop;

    f. For yellow egg products, collect product from different locations in the top of the package; 

    g. For white egg products, use a sterile scoop to move product aside and select product from the center of the package; and

    h. Fill the sterile Whirl-Pak® to about ¾ full.  Carefully shake the sample to the bottom and expel the excess air from the sample bag.  Fold over the top edge and secure it with the attached wire.

NOTE:  Dried yellow egg products and dried white egg products are sampled differently due to the differences in how they are processed.  Dried yellow egg products are pasteurized uniformly and then dried.  Dried white egg products are heat-treated in a box, with the center portion being heated up last.

D. Immediately close and seal the sample container after collecting the sample.  Place the sealed sample jars or Whirl-Pak® into the non-sterile secondary zipper-lock bag.

E. After collecting the sample, store it appropriately, under USDA lock, and under the conditions below in Table 1 until shipment to maintain integrity.

Table 1: Storage conditions for egg products prior to shipping

Liquid eggs Refrigerated
Frozen eggs     Frozen
Dried eggs     Room temperature/cool dry place

VIII.  COMPLETE THE SAMPLE TASK AND SHIP THE SAMPLE

A. IPP are to follow the instructions provided in FSIS Directive 13,000.2 for completing sampling tasks in PHIS and FSIS Directive 7355.1, Use of Sample Seals for Laboratory Samples and Other Applications, on the use of sample seals (FSIS Form 7355-2A/2B) to maintain sample security and identification.

B. To pack the shipping container, IPP are to: 

1. Retrieve the frozen gel coolant packs from the freezer (for liquid and frozen egg products) and the shipping container; 

NOTE:  For dried samples, a coolant and cardboard separator will not be included since these samples are to be maintained at room temperature.

2. Retrieve the samples from the secured location and apply the sample seals on the sample jars and sample form;

3. Place the absorbent pad on the bottom of the shipping container and, if shipping liquid or frozen samples, place the frozen gel coolant pack in the bottom or on one of the sides of the shipping container; 

4. Place the sample (in the zipper lock bag) upright inside the shipper with the cardboard separator separating it from the cold pack; 

5. Review the information on the pre-printed FedEx billable stamp provided with the sampling supplies and select the air bill with the laboratory name and address that corresponds to the FSIS laboratory name and address printed on the FSIS sample form (FSIS Form 8000-18) to ensure delivery of the sample to the correct FSIS laboratory.  Enter the return address information on the FedEx billable stamp; 

6. Place the completed, signed, and dated sample form in the plastic sleeve provided.  Place the completed sample form and any unused sample seals in the shipping container;

7. Place the foam plug down upon the upright sample container (lid on top) as tight as possible.  If the shipping container does not have a foam plug, place the insulated lid on the container.  Do not overfill the shipping container; 

NOTE:  Do not tape or wrap the samples or use any newspaper or similar material as packing material.  Use of such materials may result in a sample discard by the laboratory.

8. Apply the FSIS Laboratory Sample Container Seal (FSIS Form 7355-2A) to the inner flap of the shipping container as described in FSIS Directive 7355.1.  IPP are to close the box flaps so that the container closure system is secure.  IPP are not to tape the box if there are tapeless closures;  

9. Affix the FedEx billable stamp on the shipping container and remove any old stamp receipts and carrier shipping bar codes from the container; and

10. Ensure that the samples collected remain under FSIS control prior to pick-up by FedEx.

C. IPP are to ship samples on the day of collection or the next day, but are not to ship samples on a Saturday, or the day before a federal holiday.  

D.  IPP are to return any unused shipping containers and sampling supplies after the sampling window closes, including the FedEx billable stamp, to the FSIS Laboratory that provided the IPP with these materials.  IPP are to send a request to the FSIS Laboratory for a pre-addressed return FedEx ground-shipping bill, using the e-mail address provided in Section V.A. or Section V.B of this directive. 

IX.  SAMPLE RESULTS REPORTING AND FSIS ACTIONS

A. Sample results will be reported in PHIS.  IPP are to review the results and inform the plant of the results upon receipt.

B. If any product tests positive for Salmonella or Lm, regardless of whether FSIS collected the sample or the plant collected the sample as part of the plant’s sampling program, all product in the sampled lot is adulterated.  If the results are from a plant program sample collection, IPP are to refer to FSIS Directive 5030.1, Chapter III, Section I, and Chapter IV, Section II for instructions on how to verify food safety regulatory requirements and to document noncompliance, respectively.  The instructions below in Section IX.C apply strictly to FSIS sampling results.  

NOTE:  If the plant sampling identifies a positive for Salmonella or Lm, the plant must report it to IPP in accordance with 9 CFR 590.580(c).  Failure to promptly notify IPP of the positive result is a noncompliance; however, the positive result by itself is not a noncompliance.

C. For microbiological test results reported as “Negative,” IPP are to inform the plant that the test result is “in compliance.”

D. When FSIS sampling identifies an egg product lot as positive for Salmonella or Lm, IPP are to determine if the plant also tested the product under its documented sampling programs.  

1. If the plant did not also test the product, IPP are to issue a noncompliance citing 9 CFR 590.5 – Adulterated – under the appropriate Egg Products Food Safety task for the product sampled.  If the plant also tested the product, IPP are to check the plant’s Salmonella or Lm testing results to determine whether the plant also found the sampled product to be positive for Salmonella or Lm.

2. If the plant sampling also identified the product to be positive and the plant held the product, IPP are to verify that the plant performed the appropriate corrective measures in accordance with 9 CFR 590.422.  IPP are to issue an NR only if the plant failed to perform appropriate corrective measures. 

NOTE:  More than one lot of egg products may be affected by a positive test result if the plant did not conduct a complete clean up between pasteurization runs from the pasteurizer, all common product lines to the packaging room, and the packaging/filling equipment.  All affected product would be considered positive and would need to be re-pasteurized prior to being eligible for release into commerce.

E. For residue test results reported as “Not Detected” or “Detected – non-violative,” IPP are to inform the plant that the test result is “in compliance.”

F. When FSIS sampling identifies an egg product lot as “Detected – Violative” or “Detected but not Quantified, Violation” for residues, all product in the sampled lot is adulterated.  IPP are to issue an NR citing 9 CFR 590.5 – Adulterated – under the appropriate Egg Products Food Safety task for the product sampled;

G. If FSIS sampling identifies Salmonella, Lm, or violative residues in the sampled lot, then IPP are to:

1. Retain the product using the “U.S. Rejected/Retained” tag until the product is reprocessed (for Salmonella or Lm) or destroyed (for Salmonella, Lm, or residues) (9 CFR 590.426 and 590.422), if the product is in the plant or under the plant’s control.  If the plant elects to reprocess the product for Salmonella or Lm, it would need to use methods appropriate to the pathogen detected;

2. Review and discuss the cause or any potential cause of the positive or the violative residue with the plant’s management; 

3. Document the results of the plant management’s investigation in a Memorandum of Interview (MOI).  At a minimum, in the MOI, IPP are to include details on:

a. The affected product type, lot number, and quantity of containers in the affected lots; and

b. The retention tag number of the affected product;

4. Verify that the plant maintains a record of all affected product (for tracking purposes), including the initial number of containers affected, the lot number, and type of product (size, container type, how it is labeled).  If the plant re-pasteurizes the Salmonella or Lm-positive product into new lots of egg product, the amount of egg product re-pasteurized will be deducted from the total, until the entire lot has been reprocessed.  Depending on the type of product, a plant may choose to re-pasteurize the entire lot at one time, reconstitute and re-pasteurize, mix with other products and re-pasteurize, or leave in the heating room for additional time.

G. If the product sampled is positive for Salmonella or Lm or violative for residues and is no longer under plant control, IPP are to immediately notify their supervisor.  The supervisor will notify the District Office.  In addition, IPP are to issue a noncompliance citing 9 CFR 590.504(e) if product is positive for Salmonella or Lm and is no longer under plant control.

X. QUESTIONS

Refer questions regarding this directive to the Office of Policy and Program Development through askFSIS or by telephone at 1-800-233-3935.  

See full PDF for additional information.
 

  • USDA.gov
  • USA.gov
  • Whitehouse.gov
  • About Us
  • Our Performance
  • Information Quality & Publishing Schedule
  • Visit OIG
  • FOIA
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Non-Discrimination Statement
  • Plain Writing
  • No FEAR
  • Significant Guidance

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • GovDelivery
  • Instagram
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Linked In
  • RSS
.

Start your search

Popular Topics

Recalls Import & Export FSIS Directives FSIS Guidelines Petitions