Skip navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Food Safety
    • Recalls & Public Health Alerts
      • Report a Problem with Food
        • Additional Recalls
      • Annual Recall Summaries
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2012
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2013
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2014
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2015
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2016
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2017
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2018
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2019
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2020
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2021
        • Summary of Recall and PHA Cases in Calendar Year 2022
    • Food Safety Stats
      • Consumer Research
    • Foodborne Illness and Disease
      • Illnesses and Pathogens
        • Campylobacter
          • Campylobacter En Español
        • Clostridium botulinum
        • Escherichia coli O157:H7
        • Parasites and Foodborne Illness
        • Salmonella Questions and Answers
      • Resources for Public Health Partners
        • State Departments of Public Health
      • Outbreaks
        • Outbreak Investigations: Prevention
        • Outbreak Investigations: Response
    • Safe Food Handling and Preparation
      • Food Safety Basics
        • Additives in Meat and Poultry Products
        • Appliance Thermometers
        • Asar a la parrilla y seguridad alimentaria
        • Cleanliness Helps Prevent Foodborne Illness
        • Cooking for Groups
        • Cooking with Microwave Ovens
        • Cutting Boards
        • Deep Fat Frying
        • Doneness Versus Safety
        • Food Allergies
        • Glossary of Packaging Terms
        • Grilling Food Safely
        • Grilling and Food Safety
        • High Altitude Cooking
        • How Temperatures Affect Food
        • How to Find the USDA Establishment Number
        • Importing Meat, Poultry & Egg Products US
        • Inspection for Food Safety: The Basics
        • Irradiation and Food Safety FAQ
        • Keeping "Bag" Lunches Safe
        • Keeping Food Safe During an Emergency
        • Kitchen Thermometers
        • Mail Order Food Safety
        • Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms
        • Meat and Poultry Packaging Materials
        • Natural Flavors on Meat and Poultry Labels
        • Safe Handling of Take-Out Foods
        • Slaughter Inspection 101
        • Slow Cookers and Food Safety
        • Smoking Meat and Poultry
        • Tailgating Food Safety Q & A
        • Understanding FSIS Food Recalls
        • Water in Meat & Poultry
        • Danger Zone 40F - 140F
        • Food Product Dating
        • Freezing and Food Safety
        • Leftovers and Food Safety
        • Molds on Food: Are They Dangerous?
          • Hongos en los Alimentos: ¿Son Peligrosos?
        • Refrigeration
        • Safe Temperature Chart
        • Shelf-Stable Food
        • Steps to Keep Food Safe
        • The Big Thaw — Safe Defrosting Methods
        • The Color of Meat and Poultry
        • Washing Food: Does it Promote Food Safety?
        • Food Safety While Hiking, Camping & Boating
        • Seguridad Alimentaria Durante Caminatas, Campamentos y Paseos en Bote
      • Meat
        • Bacon and Food Safety
        • Bagre de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Beef From Farm To Table
        • Bison from Farm to Table
        • Carne de res ablandada mecánicamente
        • Catfish from Farm to Table
        • Color of Cooked Ground Beef as It Relates to Doneness
        • Corned Beef
        • Door-to-Door Meat Sales
        • Fresh Pork from Farm to Table
        • Goat from Farm to Table
        • Ground Beef and Food Safety
        • Hams and Food Safety
        • Hot Dogs & Food Safety
        • Jerky
        • Lamb From Farm to Table
        • Mechanically Tenderized Beef
        • Rabbit From Farm to Table
        • Roasting Those "Other" Holiday Meats
        • Sausages and Food Safety
        • Veal from Farm to Table
        • Yersiniosis and Chitterlings Tips
      • Poultry
        • Chicken From Farm to Table
        • Chicken Liver
        • Duck and Goose from Farm to Table
        • Hock Locks and Other Accoutrements
        • Is Pink Turkey Meat Safe?
        • Let's Talk Turkey Roasting
        • Poultry Processing: Questions & Answers
        • Poultry: Basting, Brining, and Marinating
        • Stuffing and Food Safety
        • The Poultry Label Says "Fresh"
        • Turduckens Require Safe Food Handling
        • Turkey Basics: Handling Cooked Dinners
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Cooking
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Thawing
        • Turkey Basics: Stuffing
        • Turkey from Farm to Table
        • Turkey: Alternate Routes to the Table
      • Eggs
        • Egg Products and Food Safety
        • Shell Eggs from Farm to Table
      • Emergencies
        • A Consumer's Guide to Food Safety: Severe Storms and Hurricanes
        • Fires and Food Safety
        • Keep Your Food Safe During Emergencies
        • Removing Odors from Refrigerators and Freezers
      • USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline
      • Brochures & Publications
    • Food Defense and Emergency Response
      • Emergency Response
      • Continuity of Operations (COOP)
      • Food Defense
        • Risk Mitigation Tool
        • Food Defense Considerations for Transportation of FSIS-Regulated Products
        • Food Defense Tools, Resources and Training
        • Functional Food Defense Plans
        • International Food Defense
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
          • Tables & Results Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat
          • Tables & Results: Microbiological Testing Program Pasteurized Egg Products
          • Aggregate Salmonella Categorization of Raw Chicken Parts, NRTE Comminuted Poultry, Young Chicken Carcass and Young Turkey Carcass Establishments Using Moving Windows
          • Salmonella Initiative Program Criteria
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Antimicrobial Resistance
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Raw Beef Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Ready-to-eat Products and Egg Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Salmonella
            • Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update
            • Salmonella Categorization of Individual Establishments for Poultry Products
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
          • Year-to-Date Totals: Testing of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)
          • Annual Report for STEC in Raw Ground Beef or Veal and Raw Ground Beef or Veal Components
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2017
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2018
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2016
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2015
          • Year-to-Date 2018 Totals: Results of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC):
        • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Chemical Residues and Contaminants
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • Journal Publications
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
  • Inspection
    • Inspection Programs
      • Inspection of Meat Products
        • Humane Handling Ombudsman
        • Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Poultry Products
        • Reducing Salmonella in Poultry
          • Pilot Projects: Salmonella Control Strategies
          • Proposed Regulatory Framework to Reduce Salmonella Illnesses Attributable to Poultry
            • Component 1
            • Component 2
            • Component 3
          • Salmonella By the Numbers
          • Salmonella KPI
          • Salmonella Risk Assessments
        • Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Egg Products
      • Inspection of Siluriformes
    • Compliance Guidance
      • Significant Guidance
      • HACCP
        • HACCP-Based-Inspection Models Project
          • New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS)
          • HIMP Redesign Achievement of Performance Standards Young Chicken Plants
          • List of HIMP Participating Plants
        • HACCP Validation
      • PHIS
        • PHIS: Historical Information
      • Retail Guidance
      • Small & Very Small Plant Guidance
        • Appealing Inspection Decisions
        • Food Safety Resources for Small and Very Small Plant Outreach: Order Form
        • Small Plant Help Desk
        • Small Plant Help Desk Form
      • Microbial Risk
        • Listeria Monocytogenes
        • Salmonella
        • Shiga Toxin-Producing E.Coli (STEC) and E. Coli O157:H7
        • Specified Risk Material
          • BSE Rules Being Strictly Enforced
        • Guidance for Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens - Best Practice Tips for Deli Operators
      • Specified Risk Material Resources
      • Food Safety Assessments Tools
      • Recall Process
      • Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide
      • Labeling
        • Basics of Labeling
        • Claims Guidance
        • Nonfood Compounds
          • Compounds Used for Construction and Repair in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Plants
          • Criteria Used by the Former Compounds and Packaging Branch for Evaluating Nonfood Compounds and Proprietary Substances
        • Ingredients Guidance
        • Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
          • Integration of Paper Label Applications into the Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
        • Labeling Policies
          • Human Food Made with Cultured Animal Cells
          • Regulations for Package Dating
          • Comprehensive List of Reasons for Label Modifications and Returns
        • Labeling Procedures
          • Information Required For Requesting a Temporary Approval
          • 10 Most Common Mistakes And How to Avoid Them
          • Label Submission Checklist
          • Labeling Situations That Can Not Have a Temporary Approval
          • Labeling and Establishment Responsibilities
          • Ten Most Commonly Asked Labeling Questions
          • Trans Fat Declarations in the Nutrition Facts Panel on Product Labeling
      • New Technology
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2003
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2004
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2005
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2003
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2004
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2005
        • NOL for Non-O157 STEC Test Methods
        • New Technology Information Table
      • Humane Handling
    • Import & Export
      • Import & Export Library
        • Eligible Foreign Establishments
        • U.S. Establishments by Country
          • Australia Eligible Establishments
          • Brazil Export Eligible Establishments
          • Egypt Export Eligible Establishments
          • Gibraltar Export Eligible Establishments
          • Israel Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Casings) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Cold Storage Facilities) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Mexico Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Beef) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Pork) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Poultry) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Prepared Products) Export Eligible Establishments
          • South Africa Eligible Establishments
      • Import Guidance
        • FSIS Import Procedures for Meat, Poultry & Egg Products
        • FSIS Import Reinspection
        • Sourcing Egg Products and Shell Eggs From Foreign Countries
      • Export Guidance
      • Equivalence
      • PHIS Components
      • International Reports
        • Foreign Audit Reports
        • Import and Export Data
    • Regulatory Enforcement
      • Humane Handling Enforcement
      • Quarterly Enforcement Reports
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v1)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v2)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v3)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v4)
      • FSIS Policies on Regulatory Decisions
    • Inspection Training & Videos
      • Inspection & Mission Training
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Videos
      • Regulatory Education Video Seminars
    • Apply for Grant of Inspection
      • Grants & Financial Options
    • State Inspection Programs
      • Cooperative Interstate Shipping Program
        • Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) Establishments
      • Guidance Documents for State and Local Agencies
      • States With and Without Inspection Programs
      • Reviews of State Programs
    • Establishments
      • FSIS Inspected Establishments
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Directory
    • Inspection Forms
  • About FSIS
    • History
    • Leadership & Organizational Structure
    • Strategic Planning
      • FSIS Enterprise Governance Decision Making Process
    • Core Values
    • Food Safety & Agency Partners
      • Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
    • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
      • FSIS Adjudications
      • FSIS FOIA Reading Room
      • Frequently Requested Records
      • Making a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request
    • Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
  • Contact Us
    • FSIS Offices
      • Office for Food Safety (OFS)
      • Office of the Administrator (OA)
      • Office of Field Operations (OFO)
      • Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit (OIEA)
      • Office of Public Health Science (OPHS)
      • Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD)
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)
      • Office of International Coordination (OIC)
      • Office of Employee Experience and Development (OEED)
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
      • Office of Management (OM)
      • Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE)
      • Internal Affairs (IA)
      • Office of Planning Analysis Risk Management (OPARM)
      • Civil Rights Staff
    • FSIS Department Emails
    • State Contacts
    • askFSIS
      • Having Trouble with the Webform
    • Pregúntele a Karen
  • Careers
    • Apply for a Job
    • Job Opportunities
    • Who Works for Us
      • Dr. Summer Addo — an Unexpected Career Path
      • Dr. Jeanetta Tankson Shares Her Passion for Science and Food Safety
      • Micheall Myrie - Visual Information Specialist and AAFE Award Winner
      • DDM Jeffery Jacobsen Ensures Meat is Safe and Cooks it, Too!
      • CSI Sherri Rodriguez: Thankful for FSIS and Friends
      • Stephen Whatley Celebrates 50 Years of Federal Service
      • Stevie Hretz Enjoys Putting “Humans First!”
      • Archives
    • Career Profiles
      • Administrative Positions
      • Compliance Investigator Positions
      • Consumer Safety Inspector
      • Food Inspector
      • Professional Positions
      • Public Health Veterinarian (PHV)
      • Scientific Positions
    • Incentives
      • Federal Employee Benefits Summary
    • Employment Programs
    • Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs
    • Professionals with Disabilities
  • News & Events
    • Events & Meetings
      • Officials' Calendar of Meetings
      • Food Safety Education Month
    • News & Press Releases
      • News Feeds & Subscriptions
    • Publications
    • Branding & Toolkits
  • Employees
    • HR Policies & Systems
      • Forms
      • Performance Management
      • Understanding Your Benefits
        • Emergency Backup Dependent Care (EBDC) Program
    • FSIS Safety
      • COVID-19 Pandemic Resources
        • Information about Face Coverings/Masks and Face Shields
      • Workplace Violence
    • Onboarding
      • New Hire Training
    • Agency Awards & Achievements
    • Professional Development Opportunities
      • OFO Workforce Investment Initiative Pilot Program
    • Employee News & Stories
      • FSIS Snapshots
        • March 2023 Snapshots
        • February 2023 Snapshots
        • January 2023 Snapshots
        • December 2022 Snapshots
        • September 2022 Snapshots
        • August 2022 Snapshots
        • November 2022 Snapshots
        • July 2022 Snapshots
        • October 2022 Snapshots
        • June 2022 Snapshots
        • May 2022 Snapshots
        • April 2022 Snapshots
        • March 2022 Snapshots
        • February 2022 Snapshots
        • January 2022 Snapshots
        • December 2021 Snapshots
        • November 2021 Snapshots
        • October 2021 Snapshots
        • September 2021 Snapshots
        • August 2021 Snapshots
        • July 2021 Snapshots
        • June 2021 Snapshots
      • Submit Your Stories
      • Black History Month — Resistance Through Agricultural Innovations
      • Tiffanie Newman: Versatility at FSIS and in Daily Life
      • Meet Pickle-Eating Champ, CSI Joe Smith
      • Supervisors Make All the Difference!
      • Disability: Part of the Equity Equation
      • Archives
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month - Cyber Security for Remote Work
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Occupant Emergency Planning
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Women’s Equality Day
        • ARCHIVE: Managing Heat Risk in Hot Weather
        • ARCHIVE: New Netflix Show Features USDA and FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month — Advancing Leaders Through Collaboration
        • ARCHIVE: Thank You for Your Public Service
        • ARCHIVE: World Veterinary Day — Recognizing the Resilience of FSIS Veterinarians
        • ARCHIVE: Two Hero Inspectors Provide Potentially Life-Saving CPR to a Plant Employee
        • ARCHIVE: Hero Inspector Saves a Life While on the Road
        • ARCHIVE: Administrative Professionals Day — Thank You
        • ARCHIVE: Chief Information Security Officer Marvin Lykes Recognized for Operational Excellence
        • ARCHIVE: Women’s History Month: Women Providing Healing, Promoting Hope
        • ARCHIVE: Alameda District Awards Petaluma Circuit Inspectors Recognition Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Collaborating in the Caribbean — Bringing Awareness About African Swine Fever
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Be an Advocate for Public Health
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
        • ARCHIVE: In Their Own Words: The 2021 Administrator’s Awards for Excellence Winners Speak Out
        • ARCHIVE: CSI Koffi Hoenou – From Togolese Teacher to U.S. Citizen
        • ARCHIVE: Dearborn, Mich., Circuit Inspectors Receive Collaborative Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Don’t Invite Foodborne Illness to the Party
        • ARCHIVE: Inspection for Ritual Meat and Poultry Slaughter
        • ARCHIVE: Thanksgiving Message from Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Make a Difference for You and Your Colleagues – Respond to FEVS by Dec. 3
        • ARCHIVE: American Indian/Alaskan Native Heritage Month — Together Towards Tomorrow
        • ARCHIVE: Federal State Audit Staff Twice Honored for Supporting Military Staff
        • ARCHIVE: Veterans Day Messages from FSIS Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs for Veterans
        • ARCHIVE: Disability Employment Awareness Month — America’s Recovery: Powered by Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Helping Today’s Inspectors Be Tomorrow’s Leaders with Tuition Reimbursement
        • ARCHIVE: Dr. Geraldine Vidal-Covas Embraces Her Hispanic Heritage, Encourages All
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month – Home Go Kits & Pets
        • ARCHIVE: Mask Requirements Updated for FSIS Employees
        • ARCHIVE: Modernizing Egg Inspection
        • ARCHIVE: FSIS Recognized Twice for 2020 Food Safety Education Efforts
        • ARCHIVE: Four Steps to Good Mental Health
        • ARCHIVE: Building Relationships at Work
        • ARCHIVE: Pride Month and USDA’s Commitment to Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Honoring the Dedicated Public Servants of FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American and Pacific Islander Contributions to Our Nation’s History
        • ARCHIVE: USDA Vaccination Heroes Do Their Part for America
        • ARCHIVE: Remembering Their Sacrifice: Jean Hillery, Tom Quadros and Bill Shaline
    • Facilities and Services
    • Employee Bargaining
    • Civil Rights

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • About FSIS
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Employees
  • Food Safety
  • Science & Data
  • Policy
  • Inspection
  • Recalls
  • Search
  • Full Menu
ALERT: Elkhorn Valley Packing Recalls Boneless… See more details
Page Hero
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
Subscribe for Updates
Ask FSIS

askFSIS

Find answers to questions on inspection-related policies, programs, systems, and procedures.
Find An Answer
Document in circle icon

Participate in Creating Standards

FSIS invites the food safety community to participate in establishing standards for our food safety policies and services. Join us for public meetings or respond to comment requests.
Learn More

Audits of the U.S. Meat, Poultry, and Egg Products Inspection System by Officials of Foreign Countries

FSIS directive 9000.8
Series Type 9,000 Series: Exports & Imports
Issue Date Aug 15, 2013
Full Directive
9000.8.pdf

I. PURPOSE

This directive provides instructions to FSIS personnel for planning, organizing, and working with officials of foreign countries when they audit the United States (U.S.) inspection system for meat, poultry, or egg products establishments.

KEY POINTS:

  • Outlines the process to be used by FSIS personnel to prepare for and work with foreign officials when they audit the U.S. inspection system
  • Outlines the roles and responsibilities of FSIS personnel when preparing for and working with foreign officials when they audit the U.S. inspection system
  • Provides information on post-audit activities and responsibilities

II. BACKGROUND

A. Foreign governments conduct periodic audits of the U.S. meat, poultry, and egg products food regulatory system to determine whether the U.S. inspection system is equivalent to the foreign country’s inspection system, to verify that the U.S. system is maintaining equivalence, or to verify that other requirements of the foreign country are being met by U.S. meat, poultry and egg products establishments exporting products to foreign countries.

B. The Import/Export Coordination and Policy Development Staff (IECPDS) of the Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD) serves as liaison to the auditing country in preparation for the audit and provides a coordinator to ensure that the audit is appropriately planned, organized, and carried out. IECPDS provides audit team members based upon availability of resources. If needed, IECPDS may also ask the following offices to provide audit team members: the International Audit Staff (IAS) of the Office of Office of Investigation, Enforcement and Audit (OIEA); the Office of Field Operations (OFO); additional staffs within OPPD; and the Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) of USDA.

III. AUDIT NOTIFICATION BY COUNTRY

A. IECPD/OPPD receives initial notification from a foreign country, from FAS, or otherwise of the country’s intent to conduct an audit of the U.S. system.

B. Once notified of an upcoming audit, the Director, IECPD, is to appoint an FSIS Audit Coordinator. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is the central contact point for the audit and is responsible for coordinating the audit activities with all involved FSIS programs. When products regulated by other U.S. agencies, e.g., the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), will be included in the audit, FAS is usually responsible for overall coordination of the audit. The FSIS Audit Coordinator will be responsible for coordinating the portion of the audit that addresses FSIS-regulated products, even if FAS coordinates the audit.

C. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to provide the initial notification of the intent to audit to both the Assistant Administrator (AA), OFO and the Director, OPPD/International Relations and Strategic Planning Staff (IRSPS). Once contacted, these two officials are to identify a point of contact for the audit. Throughout the audit process, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to maintain communication with the OFO point of contact, OPPD/IRSPS point of contact, other program areas, and other agencies, if applicable.

IV. AUDIT PLANNING

A. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to work with FAS or, in some cases, directly with the auditing country to obtain:

  1. The purpose, objectives, and scope of the audit (which can also be identified as a review or inspection by the foreign country);
  2. The audit standards (e.g., what standards the US system is being audited against);
  3. The number of teams and number of team members;
  4. The facilities to be audited: for example, kinds and number of establishments and facilities approved for export certification service (other facilities); one or more of the FSIS laboratories; one or more OFO District Offices; FSIS headquarters, Washington, DC; and AMS Grading and Verification Division headquarters, Denver, CO, if export verification establishments or programs are being audited;
  5. Information on whether the country plans to have an entrance conference and an exit conference; and
  6. Information on how final audit reports, if applicable, will be communicated to FSIS.

B. If the country provides a Pre-Audit Questionnaire or similar document seeking information before the start of the audit, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to coordinate within OPPD as well as with FAS to ensure completion of and delivery of the document to the foreign country. FSIS personnel are not to sign or otherwise endorse the Pre-Audit Questionnaire.

C. The FSIS Audit Coordinator, with assistance from any OFO representatives identified by the OFO point of contact, are to develop an audit itinerary based on a proposed list of establishments and other facilities to be audited or other information provided by the country and FAS. In doing so, they are to contact the proposed establishments to confirm their availability for the site visit. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to work with FAS or, in some cases, directly with the auditing country to develop a final itinerary.

D. If an establishment or other facility proposed for audit declines to participate in the audit, IECPDS is to inform the auditing country that the establishment or other facility has declined to participate in the audit and is to take action to immediately remove the eligibility of the establishment or other facility to export to the auditing country.

E. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to work with other program areas to identify the Audit Field Team whose members are to accompany the foreign auditors. The Audit Field Team may include representatives from OFO, the Office of Public Health Science (OPHS), and OPPD, as well as other agencies, such as AMS and FAS. As needed, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to hold teleconferences or convene meetings with the Audit Field Team to develop plans for the audit.

V. DATA AND INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITIES

A. Once a final itinerary is prepared, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to contact the Data Analysis and Integration Group (DAIG) of the Office of Data Integration and Food Protection and request certain data through the FSIS Footprints system about the establishments and other facilities that are on the audit itinerary (Attachment 1—Example of DAIG data request). Even after the establishments have been notified that there will be an audit, the foreign country may make changes in the list of establishments and other facilities that it will audit. If a country makes changes to the list of establishments or other facilities selected, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to contact the DAIG and request information about the new establishments or other facilities identified by the country through the FSIS Footprints system. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to forward the data and other information received from DAIG to the FSIS personnel accompanying the foreign auditors and the IRSPS point of contact.

B. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to request the data listed in V.C. for the 6 months preceding the date of the request unless there is a need to request data for a different time period.

C. At a minimum, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to request the following data (if applicable) for each establishment or facility selected for audit:

  1. FSA summary page. If further actions were recommended against an establishment or other facility, request the full report;
  2. Closed noncompliance reports;
  3. Open noncompliance reports;
  4. Microbiological and residue sampling results;
  5. Humane handling violations if meat slaughter plants are to be audited; noncompliance reports for problems with “good commercial practices” under 04C04 with 9 CFR 381.65(b) (re: poultry slaughter establishments).

D. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is also to obtain the following information from the following sources (not the DAIG):

1. Background from establishment profile in PHIS:

  • a. Grant of inspection;
  • b. FSIS staffing levels;
  • c. HACCP process categories; and
  • d. Operating schedule.

2. From IECPDS and OFO:

  • a. Past deficiencies and corresponding corrective actions from previous audits by country and port of entry violations reported by the auditing country and corresponding corrective actions; and FSIS verification documentation on effectiveness of corrective actions;
  • b. Status of export activity—active or inactive; and
  • c. AMS audit reports (if plants to be audited operate under an AMS Export Verification (EV) program or other AMS process verification program).

E. Once the data are received from the DAIG and other sources, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to convene a meeting with the audit team to review the data to identify possible problem areas and other concerns. Serious problems or concerns are those that could negatively impact the outcome of the audit if not addressed prior to the start of the audit. If the audit team does not identify any problems, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to proceed with preparing for the audit.

F. Using the identified purpose, scope, and objective of the upcoming audit as provided by the foreign country (if this information is provided by the auditing country), combined with any concerns or problems resulting from the analysis of data, the FSIS Audit Coordinator will identify the topics and the type of information, if any, that will be prepared and given to the auditing country during the audit entrance meeting. There may also be specific country requests or interests related to the significant policies and operational procedures the audit is covering or related to recent or pending FSIS initiatives.

VI. MEETING WITH OFO DISTRICT OFFICES TO DISCUSS DATA RESULTS AND THE FINAL ITINERARY

A. If the data review or information gathered identifies problems that could negatively affect the outcome of the audit, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to share the information with the appropriate OFO/Executive Associate for Regulatory Operations (EARO) and is to discuss with the EARO problem areas and any other concerns. The FSIS Audit Coordinator and EARO are to provide their determinations and recommendations to the AA, OFO, and AA, OPPD for concurrence.

B. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to send the final itinerary for the audit to the AA and affected EAROs, OFO; the Director, IRSPS, OPPD; each of the FSIS personnel traveling with the team; the AA and the Executive Associate for Laboratory Services, OPHS (if the audit includes one or more FSIS laboratories); the designated point of contact within the FAS; and to appropriate industry trade associations (e.g., USMEF, USAPEEC, etc.). The FSIS Audit Coordinator is also to send the final itinerary to the Director, Grading and Verification Division, AMS and to the designated contact point within the FDA, if these agencies are involved with the audit. The affected OFO/EAROs are to notify District Managers, field supervisors, and in-plant personnel regarding the audit itinerary.

C. After providing the final itinerary to OFO, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to arrange a teleconference with the EAROs, appropriate District Managers, the Director, IRSPS, and all audit team members. District Managers are to notify appropriate field supervisors and in-plant personnel of the teleconference. The purpose of the teleconference is to ensure that all involved FSIS personnel are informed of the upcoming audit, know what to expect, and know how to handle questions or concerns from the foreign auditors. The teleconference will also provide OFO personnel with an opportunity to ask questions and to confirm itinerary arrangements.

VII. OFO AUDIT PREPARATION ACTIVITIES

A. After the meeting with the FSIS Audit Coordinator and other audit team members, the designated representatives from the affected District Offices are to take the necessary action to ensure that all affected IPP and the management of selected establishments and facilities approved for export certification service are aware of the upcoming audit and the approximate dates of visits by the foreign auditors. The DO representatives are also to take steps to ensure that IPP at the selected establishments and other facilities are prepared for the audit;

  1. The SPHV or FLS responsible for the selected establishments and other facilities are to direct IPP to become familiar with the Export Library entry, if any, for the auditing country.
  2. At the next weekly meeting after being notified by the DO or FLS of the audit, the SPHV or the IPP at the selected establishments are to discuss the upcoming audit with establishment management, and for those facilities that are approved for export certification service, the SPHV or the IPP assigned to the facility are to discuss the upcoming audit with facility management. IPP are to document the establishment meeting or the facility meeting in a Memorandum of Interview in accordance with FSIS PHIS Directive 5000.1, Verifying an Establishment’s Food Safety System, and FSIS Directive 5010.1, Food Safety Related Topics for Discussion During Weekly Meetings.
  3. At least 10 days before the audit visit, IPP are to perform an SPS and HACCP verification task, if applicable, at the selected establishment or facility. When performing these tasks, IPP are to focus on any areas of concern and ensure that the establishment has implemented any programs required by the auditing country as described in the Export Library. IPP are to document any findings of regulatory noncompliance in accordance with FSIS PHIS Directive 5000.1 and FSIS PHIS Directive 13,000.1, Scheduling In-Plant Inspection Tasks in the Public Health Information System.
  4. IPP are to report to the DO, through supervisory channels, any concerns related to their review of the Export Library entry, the weekly meeting with the establishment, or the SPS and HACCP verification task.

B. The DO representative is to advise the FSIS Audit Coordinator of all concerns arising from the audit preparation activities as soon as possible after the concerns have been identified, as well as the steps that the DO is taking to have the concerns appropriately addressed by the establishment.

C. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to advise the Director, IECPDS and the OFO/EARO of all concerns arising from the audit preparation activities so that they can verify that the concerns have been adequately addressed. Any unresolved concerns are to be elevated to the AA, OFO and AA, OPPD to agree on a course of action to ensure on-going compliance with FSIS and foreign country requirements.

VIII. OFO ACTIVITIES DURING THE AUDIT

The DO is to ensure that at least one management official from the DO is present and accompanies the foreign auditors during each audit of individual establishments and other facilities.

IX. ENTRANCE MEETING

A. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to arrange for the audit entrance meeting.

B. Invitees are to include:

  1. AA, OFO;
  2. EAROs, OFO (as applicable);
  3. AA, OPPD;
  4. Director, IECPDS, OPPD;
  5. Director, IAS, OIEA;
  6. Director, IRSPS, OPPD ;
  7. Field Team members; and
  8. Other Program areas and Agencies as necessary and appropriate (e.g., OPHS, AMS, FAS, APHIS).

C. If the entrance meeting is held in Washington, DC, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to arrange for a conference room. The entrance and exit meetings may or may not be held in Washington, DC.

D. If a country wishes to have an entrance conference before the foreign audit team arrives in the U.S., the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to work with FAS to arrange a teleconference or Digital Video Conference with the country.

X. ACTIVITIES AND PROCEDURES DURING THE AUDIT

A. During the audit, Audit Field Team members are to complete the Establishment Audit Worksheet (Attachment 2) for each establishment visited to record daily audit observations and findings. The daily audit observations and findings are to describe the foreign audit team’s observations and findings. If the foreign audit team’s observations or findings are violations of FSIS regulatory requirements, the Audit Field Team members are to document how any observed deficiencies violate FSIS regulatory requirements by citing the applicable regulation and summarizing the regulatory requirement. In addition, the Audit Field Team members are to advise the foreign auditors that a noncompliance report will be issued by IPP. If an observation or finding contradicts or is in conflict with FSIS regulations or policies, the Audit Field Team is to include corresponding comments in the Daily Summary Audit Report on the observation or finding from the FSIS perspective.

NOTE: If, at any time during the audit, controversial or problematic issues are identified by either the country or FSIS personnel, the audit team members are to immediately notify the Director of IECPDS, who will discuss the situation with OFO and OPPD management.

B. Audit Field Team members are to submit summary reports and worksheets by email to the FSIS Audit Coordinator as soon as possible at the conclusion of the day’s activities.

C. If the foreign auditors decide to delist an establishment or to take another adverse regulatory action, the Audit Field Team member is to immediately inform the IECPDS of this information. IECPDS is to immediately advise appropriate OFO and OPPD managers and AMS (if the establishment is operating under an AMS-approved Export Verification (EV) program or other process verification program) of the delistment or other adverse regulatory action. IECPDS is to post a notice of the delistment of the specific establishment in the Export Library with the effective date.

D. During the audit, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to prepare a summary of the previous day’s results and observations and is to e-mail the summary to the designated points of contact in OFO, OPPD, and other Program areas, as appropriate.

E. An example of a completed Daily Summary Audit Report is attached (Attachment 3). The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to use this format to report daily results. At the end of the audit, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to assemble a complete Daily Audit Summary Report, including all daily reports.

XI. PRE-EXIT MEETING

A. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to schedule an internal pre-exit meeting at least one day before the conclusion of the audit to discuss the audit findings, the appropriate FSIS response to the audit findings, and any other potential issues that may have arisen during the audit.

B. Invitees are to include:

  1. OFO, EAROs (as applicable);
  2. Director, IECPDS, OPPD;
  3. Director, IAS, OIEA;
  4. Director, IRSPS, OPPD;
  5. Field Team members; and
  6. Other Program areas or agencies as necessary and appropriate (e.g., OPHS, AMS).

XII. EXIT MEETING

A. IECPDS is to schedule an exit meeting with the foreign country at the beginning of the audit. The exit meeting is normally to be held on the day after the conclusion of field visits. The meeting can be held in Washington, DC or at another USDA/FSIS office if this arrangement is more convenient for the foreign auditors.

B. Invitees are to include:

  1. AA, OFO;
  2. Director, IECPDS, OPPD;
  3. Director, IAS, OIEA;
  4. Director, IRSPS, OPPD ;
  5. Field Team members; and
  6. Other program areas or agencies as necessary and appropriate (e.g., OPHS, AMS, FAS, APHIS).

C. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to prepare an agenda for the exit meeting and is to distribute the agenda to the FSIS participants and the foreign country participants prior to the exit meeting. Exit agenda topics are to include:

  1. . Audit findings; and
  2. Discussion.

D. After the exit meeting, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to prepare a summary of the discussion at the exit meeting, including the corrective action items needed and any additional information to be provided to the country and is to distribute the summary to the FSIS participants as the final entry in the Daily Summary Audit Report.

E. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to assemble all documents relating to the audit, have them scanned for electronic filing, and post them on the OPPD SharePoint site. All audit team members are to have access to this site. Documents to be posted include:

  1. . Audit entrance and exit meeting agendas;
  2. The final Daily Summary Audit Report with cumulative findings;
  3. All Establishment Audit Worksheets;
  4. Corrective or other actions needed by audited establishments and other facilities;
  5. The draft audit report if provided by the foreign country; and
  6. The final audit report if provided by the foreign country.

XIII. RESPONSE TO DRAFT AUDIT REPORT

A. If the foreign auditors indicate that they will submit a draft audit report, and if the draft report is not received from the auditing country within the timeframes agreed to during audit notification or audit exit meeting, IECPDS is to contact the country or request that FAS contact the country to ask about the status of the report.

B. Upon receipt of the draft audit report, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to circulate it to the following representatives for comment.

  1. . AA, OPPD;
  2. AA, OFO;
  3. AA, OIEA;
  4. Director, IECPDS, OPPD;
  5. Director, IAS, OIEA; and
  6. Director, IRSPS, OPPD.

C. The FSIS Audit Coordinator is to compile the comments, determine whether the comments warrant changes to the draft audit report, and ensure that the comments are cleared by the Director, IECPDS, the Director, IRSPS, and the AAs of OFO and OPPD before they are sent to the country.

XIV. FINAL AUDIT REPORT

A. Upon receipt of the final audit report, the FSIS Audit Coordinator is to post the final audit report to the SharePoint site.

B. The FSIS Audit Coordinator will distribute copies of the final report to:

  1. AA, OPPD;
  2. AA, OFO;
  3. AA, OIEA;
  4. Director, IECPDS, OPPD;
  5. Director, IAS, OIEA; and
  6. Director, IRSPS, OPPD.

XV. DATA ANALYSIS

IECPDS and IRSPS will develop an end-of-year report that summarizes the findings and corrective actions taken as a result of audits performed by foreign countries to identify any trends or relationships of non-compliance for individual establishments, any District–specific concerns, or any FSIS systemic problems. The results will be used to guide FSIS in the development of industry guidance documents, industry outreach activities, inspection procedures, or changes to FSIS directives or regulations.

XVI. QUESTIONS

Refer questions regarding this directive through askFSIS or by telephone at 1-855-444-9904. When submitting a question, use the Submit a Question tab and enter the following information in the fields provided:

  • Subject Field: Enter Directive 9000.8
  • Question Field: Enter question with as much detail as possible.
  • Product Field: Select Import from the drop-down menu.
  • Category Field: Select Basic Import Answers from the drop-down menu.
  • Policy Arena: Select International (Import/Export) from the drop-down menu.

When all fields are complete, press Continue.

  • See full PDF for Attachment
  • ATTACHMENT 1- Example of DAIG Data Request.
  • ATTACHMENT 2 -Establishment Audit Worksheet.
  • ATTACHMENT 3 - Summary of Results Country Review of the U.S. Inspection System Date.
  • USDA.gov
  • USA.gov
  • Whitehouse.gov
  • About Us
  • Our Performance
  • Information Quality & Publishing Schedule
  • Visit OIG
  • FOIA
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Non-Discrimination Statement
  • Plain Writing
  • No FEAR
  • Significant Guidance

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • GovDelivery
  • Instagram
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Linked In
  • RSS
.

Start your search

Popular Topics

Recalls Import & Export FSIS Directives FSIS Guidelines Petitions