Skip navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Food Safety
    • Recalls & Public Health Alerts
      • Report a Problem with Food
        • Additional Recalls
      • Annual Recall Summaries
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2012
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2013
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2014
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2015
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2016
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2017
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2018
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2019
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2020
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2021
        • Summary of Recall and PHA Cases in Calendar Year 2022
    • Food Safety Stats
      • Consumer Research
    • Foodborne Illness and Disease
      • Illnesses and Pathogens
        • Campylobacter
          • Campylobacter En Español
        • Clostridium botulinum
        • Escherichia coli O157:H7
        • Parasites and Foodborne Illness
        • Salmonella Questions and Answers
      • Resources for Public Health Partners
        • State Departments of Public Health
      • Outbreaks
        • Outbreak Investigations: Prevention
        • Outbreak Investigations: Response
    • Safe Food Handling and Preparation
      • Food Safety Basics
        • Additives in Meat and Poultry Products
        • Appliance Thermometers
        • Asar a la parrilla y seguridad alimentaria
        • Cleanliness Helps Prevent Foodborne Illness
        • Cooking for Groups
        • Cooking with Microwave Ovens
        • Cutting Boards
        • Deep Fat Frying
        • Doneness Versus Safety
        • Food Allergies
        • Glossary of Packaging Terms
        • Grilling Food Safely
        • Grilling and Food Safety
        • High Altitude Cooking
        • How Temperatures Affect Food
        • How to Find the USDA Establishment Number
        • Importing Meat, Poultry & Egg Products US
        • Inspection for Food Safety: The Basics
        • Irradiation and Food Safety FAQ
        • Keeping "Bag" Lunches Safe
        • Keeping Food Safe During an Emergency
        • Kitchen Thermometers
        • Mail Order Food Safety
        • Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms
        • Meat and Poultry Packaging Materials
        • Natural Flavors on Meat and Poultry Labels
        • Safe Handling of Take-Out Foods
        • Slaughter Inspection 101
        • Slow Cookers and Food Safety
        • Smoking Meat and Poultry
        • Tailgating Food Safety Q & A
        • Understanding FSIS Food Recalls
        • Water in Meat & Poultry
        • Danger Zone 40F - 140F
        • Food Product Dating
        • Freezing and Food Safety
        • Leftovers and Food Safety
        • Molds on Food: Are They Dangerous?
          • Hongos en los Alimentos: ¿Son Peligrosos?
        • Refrigeration
        • Safe Temperature Chart
        • Shelf-Stable Food
        • Steps to Keep Food Safe
        • The Big Thaw — Safe Defrosting Methods
        • The Color of Meat and Poultry
        • Washing Food: Does it Promote Food Safety?
        • Food Safety While Hiking, Camping & Boating
        • Seguridad Alimentaria Durante Caminatas, Campamentos y Paseos en Bote
      • Meat
        • Bacon and Food Safety
        • Bagre de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Beef From Farm To Table
        • Bison from Farm to Table
        • Carne de res ablandada mecánicamente
        • Catfish from Farm to Table
        • Color of Cooked Ground Beef as It Relates to Doneness
        • Corned Beef
        • Door-to-Door Meat Sales
        • Fresh Pork from Farm to Table
        • Goat from Farm to Table
        • Ground Beef and Food Safety
        • Hams and Food Safety
        • Hot Dogs & Food Safety
        • Jerky
        • Lamb From Farm to Table
        • Mechanically Tenderized Beef
        • Rabbit From Farm to Table
        • Roasting Those "Other" Holiday Meats
        • Sausages and Food Safety
        • Veal from Farm to Table
        • Yersiniosis and Chitterlings Tips
      • Poultry
        • Chicken From Farm to Table
        • Chicken Liver
        • Duck and Goose from Farm to Table
        • Hock Locks and Other Accoutrements
        • Is Pink Turkey Meat Safe?
        • Let's Talk Turkey Roasting
        • Poultry Processing: Questions & Answers
        • Poultry: Basting, Brining, and Marinating
        • Stuffing and Food Safety
        • The Poultry Label Says "Fresh"
        • Turduckens Require Safe Food Handling
        • Turkey Basics: Handling Cooked Dinners
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Cooking
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Thawing
        • Turkey Basics: Stuffing
        • Turkey from Farm to Table
        • Turkey: Alternate Routes to the Table
      • Eggs
        • Egg Products and Food Safety
        • Shell Eggs from Farm to Table
      • Emergencies
        • A Consumer's Guide to Food Safety: Severe Storms and Hurricanes
        • Fires and Food Safety
        • Keep Your Food Safe During Emergencies
        • Removing Odors from Refrigerators and Freezers
      • USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline
      • Brochures & Publications
    • Food Defense and Emergency Response
      • Emergency Response
      • Continuity of Operations (COOP)
      • Food Defense
        • Risk Mitigation Tool
        • Food Defense Considerations for Transportation of FSIS-Regulated Products
        • Food Defense Tools, Resources and Training
        • Functional Food Defense Plans
        • International Food Defense
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
          • Tables & Results Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat
          • Tables & Results: Microbiological Testing Program Pasteurized Egg Products
          • Aggregate Salmonella Categorization of Raw Chicken Parts, NRTE Comminuted Poultry, Young Chicken Carcass and Young Turkey Carcass Establishments Using Moving Windows
          • Salmonella Initiative Program Criteria
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Antimicrobial Resistance
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Raw Beef Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Ready-to-eat Products and Egg Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Salmonella
            • Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update
            • Salmonella Categorization of Individual Establishments for Poultry Products
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
          • Year-to-Date Totals: Testing of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)
          • Annual Report for STEC in Raw Ground Beef or Veal and Raw Ground Beef or Veal Components
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2017
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2018
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2016
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2015
          • Year-to-Date 2018 Totals: Results of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC):
        • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Chemical Residues and Contaminants
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • Journal Publications
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
  • Inspection
    • Inspection Programs
      • Inspection of Meat Products
        • Humane Handling Ombudsman
        • Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Poultry Products
        • Reducing Salmonella in Poultry
          • Pilot Projects: Salmonella Control Strategies
          • Proposed Regulatory Framework to Reduce Salmonella Illnesses Attributable to Poultry
            • Component 1
            • Component 2
            • Component 3
          • Salmonella By the Numbers
          • Salmonella KPI
          • Salmonella Risk Assessments
        • Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Egg Products
      • Inspection of Siluriformes
    • Compliance Guidance
      • Significant Guidance
      • HACCP
        • HACCP-Based-Inspection Models Project
          • New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS)
          • HIMP Redesign Achievement of Performance Standards Young Chicken Plants
          • List of HIMP Participating Plants
        • HACCP Validation
      • PHIS
        • PHIS: Historical Information
      • Retail Guidance
      • Small & Very Small Plant Guidance
        • Appealing Inspection Decisions
        • Food Safety Resources for Small and Very Small Plant Outreach: Order Form
        • Small Plant Help Desk
        • Small Plant Help Desk Form
      • Microbial Risk
        • Listeria Monocytogenes
        • Salmonella
        • Shiga Toxin-Producing E.Coli (STEC) and E. Coli O157:H7
        • Specified Risk Material
          • BSE Rules Being Strictly Enforced
        • Guidance for Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens - Best Practice Tips for Deli Operators
      • Specified Risk Material Resources
      • Food Safety Assessments Tools
      • Recall Process
      • Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide
      • Labeling
        • Basics of Labeling
        • Claims Guidance
        • Nonfood Compounds
          • Compounds Used for Construction and Repair in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Plants
          • Criteria Used by the Former Compounds and Packaging Branch for Evaluating Nonfood Compounds and Proprietary Substances
        • Ingredients Guidance
        • Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
          • Integration of Paper Label Applications into the Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
        • Labeling Policies
          • Human Food Made with Cultured Animal Cells
          • Regulations for Package Dating
          • Comprehensive List of Reasons for Label Modifications and Returns
        • Labeling Procedures
          • Information Required For Requesting a Temporary Approval
          • 10 Most Common Mistakes And How to Avoid Them
          • Label Submission Checklist
          • Labeling Situations That Can Not Have a Temporary Approval
          • Labeling and Establishment Responsibilities
          • Ten Most Commonly Asked Labeling Questions
          • Trans Fat Declarations in the Nutrition Facts Panel on Product Labeling
      • New Technology
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2003
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2004
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2005
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2003
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2004
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2005
        • NOL for Non-O157 STEC Test Methods
        • New Technology Information Table
      • Humane Handling
    • Import & Export
      • Import & Export Library
        • Eligible Foreign Establishments
        • U.S. Establishments by Country
          • Australia Eligible Establishments
          • Brazil Export Eligible Establishments
          • Egypt Export Eligible Establishments
          • Gibraltar Export Eligible Establishments
          • Israel Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Casings) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Cold Storage Facilities) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Mexico Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Beef) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Pork) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Poultry) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Prepared Products) Export Eligible Establishments
          • South Africa Eligible Establishments
      • Import Guidance
        • FSIS Import Procedures for Meat, Poultry & Egg Products
        • FSIS Import Reinspection
        • Sourcing Egg Products and Shell Eggs From Foreign Countries
      • Export Guidance
      • Equivalence
      • PHIS Components
      • International Reports
        • Foreign Audit Reports
        • Import and Export Data
    • Regulatory Enforcement
      • Humane Handling Enforcement
      • Quarterly Enforcement Reports
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v1)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v2)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v3)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v4)
      • FSIS Policies on Regulatory Decisions
    • Inspection Training & Videos
      • Inspection & Mission Training
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Videos
      • Regulatory Education Video Seminars
    • Apply for Grant of Inspection
      • Grants & Financial Options
    • State Inspection Programs
      • Cooperative Interstate Shipping Program
        • Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) Establishments
      • Guidance Documents for State and Local Agencies
      • States With and Without Inspection Programs
      • Reviews of State Programs
    • Establishments
      • FSIS Inspected Establishments
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Directory
    • Inspection Forms
  • About FSIS
    • History
    • Leadership & Organizational Structure
    • Strategic Planning
      • FSIS Enterprise Governance Decision Making Process
    • Core Values
    • Food Safety & Agency Partners
      • Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
    • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
      • FSIS Adjudications
      • FSIS FOIA Reading Room
      • Frequently Requested Records
      • Making a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request
    • Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
  • Contact Us
    • FSIS Offices
      • Office for Food Safety (OFS)
      • Office of the Administrator (OA)
      • Office of Field Operations (OFO)
      • Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit (OIEA)
      • Office of Public Health Science (OPHS)
      • Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD)
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)
      • Office of International Coordination (OIC)
      • Office of Employee Experience and Development (OEED)
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
      • Office of Management (OM)
      • Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE)
      • Internal Affairs (IA)
      • Office of Planning Analysis Risk Management (OPARM)
      • Civil Rights Staff
    • FSIS Department Emails
    • State Contacts
    • askFSIS
      • Having Trouble with the Webform
    • Pregúntele a Karen
  • Careers
    • Apply for a Job
    • Job Opportunities
    • Who Works for Us
      • Dr. Summer Addo — an Unexpected Career Path
      • Dr. Jeanetta Tankson Shares Her Passion for Science and Food Safety
      • Micheall Myrie - Visual Information Specialist and AAFE Award Winner
      • DDM Jeffery Jacobsen Ensures Meat is Safe and Cooks it, Too!
      • CSI Sherri Rodriguez: Thankful for FSIS and Friends
      • Stephen Whatley Celebrates 50 Years of Federal Service
      • Stevie Hretz Enjoys Putting “Humans First!”
      • Archives
    • Career Profiles
      • Administrative Positions
      • Compliance Investigator Positions
      • Consumer Safety Inspector
      • Food Inspector
      • Professional Positions
      • Public Health Veterinarian (PHV)
      • Scientific Positions
    • Incentives
      • Federal Employee Benefits Summary
    • Employment Programs
    • Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs
    • Professionals with Disabilities
  • News & Events
    • Events & Meetings
      • Officials' Calendar of Meetings
      • Food Safety Education Month
    • News & Press Releases
      • News Feeds & Subscriptions
    • Publications
    • Branding & Toolkits
  • Employees
    • HR Policies & Systems
      • Forms
      • Performance Management
      • Understanding Your Benefits
        • Emergency Backup Dependent Care (EBDC) Program
    • FSIS Safety
      • COVID-19 Pandemic Resources
        • Information about Face Coverings/Masks and Face Shields
      • Workplace Violence
    • Onboarding
      • New Hire Training
    • Agency Awards & Achievements
    • Professional Development Opportunities
      • OFO Workforce Investment Initiative Pilot Program
    • Employee News & Stories
      • FSIS Snapshots
        • March 2023 Snapshots
        • February 2023 Snapshots
        • January 2023 Snapshots
        • December 2022 Snapshots
        • September 2022 Snapshots
        • August 2022 Snapshots
        • November 2022 Snapshots
        • July 2022 Snapshots
        • October 2022 Snapshots
        • June 2022 Snapshots
        • May 2022 Snapshots
        • April 2022 Snapshots
        • March 2022 Snapshots
        • February 2022 Snapshots
        • January 2022 Snapshots
        • December 2021 Snapshots
        • November 2021 Snapshots
        • October 2021 Snapshots
        • September 2021 Snapshots
        • August 2021 Snapshots
        • July 2021 Snapshots
        • June 2021 Snapshots
      • Submit Your Stories
      • Black History Month — Resistance Through Agricultural Innovations
      • Tiffanie Newman: Versatility at FSIS and in Daily Life
      • Meet Pickle-Eating Champ, CSI Joe Smith
      • Supervisors Make All the Difference!
      • Disability: Part of the Equity Equation
      • Archives
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month - Cyber Security for Remote Work
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Occupant Emergency Planning
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Women’s Equality Day
        • ARCHIVE: Managing Heat Risk in Hot Weather
        • ARCHIVE: New Netflix Show Features USDA and FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month — Advancing Leaders Through Collaboration
        • ARCHIVE: Thank You for Your Public Service
        • ARCHIVE: World Veterinary Day — Recognizing the Resilience of FSIS Veterinarians
        • ARCHIVE: Two Hero Inspectors Provide Potentially Life-Saving CPR to a Plant Employee
        • ARCHIVE: Hero Inspector Saves a Life While on the Road
        • ARCHIVE: Administrative Professionals Day — Thank You
        • ARCHIVE: Chief Information Security Officer Marvin Lykes Recognized for Operational Excellence
        • ARCHIVE: Women’s History Month: Women Providing Healing, Promoting Hope
        • ARCHIVE: Alameda District Awards Petaluma Circuit Inspectors Recognition Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Collaborating in the Caribbean — Bringing Awareness About African Swine Fever
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Be an Advocate for Public Health
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
        • ARCHIVE: In Their Own Words: The 2021 Administrator’s Awards for Excellence Winners Speak Out
        • ARCHIVE: CSI Koffi Hoenou – From Togolese Teacher to U.S. Citizen
        • ARCHIVE: Dearborn, Mich., Circuit Inspectors Receive Collaborative Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Don’t Invite Foodborne Illness to the Party
        • ARCHIVE: Inspection for Ritual Meat and Poultry Slaughter
        • ARCHIVE: Thanksgiving Message from Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Make a Difference for You and Your Colleagues – Respond to FEVS by Dec. 3
        • ARCHIVE: American Indian/Alaskan Native Heritage Month — Together Towards Tomorrow
        • ARCHIVE: Federal State Audit Staff Twice Honored for Supporting Military Staff
        • ARCHIVE: Veterans Day Messages from FSIS Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs for Veterans
        • ARCHIVE: Disability Employment Awareness Month — America’s Recovery: Powered by Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Helping Today’s Inspectors Be Tomorrow’s Leaders with Tuition Reimbursement
        • ARCHIVE: Dr. Geraldine Vidal-Covas Embraces Her Hispanic Heritage, Encourages All
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month – Home Go Kits & Pets
        • ARCHIVE: Mask Requirements Updated for FSIS Employees
        • ARCHIVE: Modernizing Egg Inspection
        • ARCHIVE: FSIS Recognized Twice for 2020 Food Safety Education Efforts
        • ARCHIVE: Four Steps to Good Mental Health
        • ARCHIVE: Building Relationships at Work
        • ARCHIVE: Pride Month and USDA’s Commitment to Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Honoring the Dedicated Public Servants of FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American and Pacific Islander Contributions to Our Nation’s History
        • ARCHIVE: USDA Vaccination Heroes Do Their Part for America
        • ARCHIVE: Remembering Their Sacrifice: Jean Hillery, Tom Quadros and Bill Shaline
    • Facilities and Services
    • Employee Bargaining
    • Civil Rights

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • About FSIS
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Employees
  • Food Safety
  • Science & Data
  • Policy
  • Inspection
  • Recalls
  • Search
  • Full Menu
ALERT: Elkhorn Valley Packing Recalls Boneless… See more details
Page Hero
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
Subscribe for Updates
Ask FSIS

askFSIS

Find answers to questions on inspection-related policies, programs, systems, and procedures.
Find An Answer
Document in circle icon

Participate in Creating Standards

FSIS invites the food safety community to participate in establishing standards for our food safety policies and services. Join us for public meetings or respond to comment requests.
Learn More

Label Verification of Imported Meat, Poultry, and Egg Products - Revision 2

FSIS directive 9900.5
Series Type 9,000 Series: Exports & Imports
Issue Date Dec 21, 2020
Full Directive
9900.5.pdf

DO NOT IMPLEMENT THIS DIRECTIVE UNTIL DECEMBER 28, 2020.

I. PURPOSE

This directive provides instructions to inspection program personnel (IPP) for conducting label verification of imported meat, poultry, and egg products. FSIS is reissuing this directive to update regulatory cites for egg products contained in the final rule Egg Products Inspection Regulations (85 FR 68640) and the timeframe in which an applicant may appeal egg products that were refused entry, based on the egg products final rule.

II. CANCELLATION

FSIS Directive 9900.5, Revision 1, Label Verification of Imported Meat, Poultry and Egg Products, 1/24/19

III. BACKGROUND

Foreign establishments exporting to the United States (U.S.) are required to adhere to the labeling requirements in the Federal meat, poultry, and egg product regulations in Title 9 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). IPP verify compliance of imported product presented for reinspection with the labeling regulations by examining the labeling features on shipping and immediate containers, protective coverings, primal parts and carcasses.

IV. LABEL VERIFICATION

A. IPP are to verify that shipping containers, immediate containers, protective coverings, primal parts, and carcasses in every lot presented for reinspection meet FSIS labeling or marking requirements.

B. IPP are to:

  1. Select the number of sample units (pallets, totes, carcasses) from the presented lots using Table A below;
  2. Generate random numbers to determine which units in the presented lot are to be identified as the label verification pallets (LVP) or sample units; and
  3. Based on the number of units (pallets, totes, carcasses) in the presented lot, examine the number of designated sample units (e.g., 15 pallets in presented lot = 2 pallets as designated sample units) after the lot is staged for general condition examination. IPP are to examine the labeling of all cartons on each pallet identified as a sample unit.

C. If any sample cartons need to be opened, to determine label requirements on the interior products or containers (e.g., protective coverings, immediate containers), the sample cartons may need to be moved into the inspection room in the official import inspection establishment. Each shipping container opened to verify the labeling of inner contents must be identified as "USDA OFFICIAL IMPORT SAMPLE.”

V. LABEL VERIFICATION; SHIPMENTS FROM CANADA

A. When verifying the labeling of shipments from Canada that are not assigned any additional types of inspection (TOIs), IPP are to perform label verification on a single shipping container from each lot on the inspection certificate. The label verification is to be performed at the rear of the open truck or trailer backed into the unloading dock at the official import inspection establishment. Import inspection establishment management may rearrange the containers to facilitate the label verification. IPP are to have the establishment unload the conveyance and stage the lot(s), and IPP are to verify the general condition and labeling according to the procedures described in B and C above if any of the following occur:

  1. IPP observe or suspect any issues with the contents of the conveyance;
  2. The Label Verification or Certification TOI of the lot(s) is assigned at the intensified or increased level; or
  3. Additional TOIs (e.g., product exam, laboratory sampling, etc.) are assigned that necessitate unloading and staging of the lot(s) for IPP to select random samples.

B. Shipments from Canada that receive additional TOIs, other than Certification and Label Verification, are to be staged in an approved staging area in the official import inspection establishment where reinspection, including label verification, can occur.

C. When carcasses, sides, or quarters of livestock or ratites are presented for reinspection on a pallet or in a tote labeled as a shipping container, IPP are to verify that the labeling of that pallet or tote meets FSIS requirements.

D. When carcasses are individually labeled with the requirements for shipping containers, IPP are to verify that the labeling of each carcass on that pallet meets FSIS requirements.

VI. VERIFICATION PROCEDURE

A. IPP are to verify that labels are:

  1. Mechanically printed, stenciled, or stamped directly on the shipping container or on a self-destructive (cannot be removed and placed on another carton) adhesive label affixed to the shipping container. Handwriting is not acceptable on labeling, except for the following: 1) adding the value of random net weights in open net weight statements; or 2) marking checks in pre-printed check-off boxes. Handwriting must be in permanent ink; and
  2. In the English language. EXCEPTION: Products distributed solely in Puerto Rico may be labeled in Spanish only (9 CFR 317.2(b)).

B. Shipping Containers (meat and poultry) - IPP are to verify that shipping containers (i.e., the outside container) include the:

  1. Name of the country of origin preceded by "Product of;”
    • NOTE: If the name of the country appears in the foreign country’s mark of inspection, or if the shipping container contains fully labeled immediate containers, the phrase "Product of” need not appear (9 CFR 327.14).
  2. Establishment number assigned by the foreign inspection system;
  3. Name of the product;
  4. Name and address of the foreign establishment, distributor, or importer, unless it appears on the labels of the immediate containers, if applicable;
  5. A complete and legible shipping mark, or other unique identifier that links the product to the foreign inspection certificate. These unique marks are used to link each lot of product to the corresponding lot on a foreign inspection certificate, or other foreign certification documents. FSIS regulations do not prohibit duplicate shipping marks;
  6. A special handling statement, where applicable, such as "Keep Refrigerated," "Keep Frozen," "Perishable, Keep Under Refrigeration," or such other statement as FSIS’s Labeling and Program Delivery Staff (LPDS) may approve in specific cases (9 CFR 317.2);
  7. Sufficient space on the main display panel for the USDA mark of import inspection (not applicable for products from Canada) to ensure that the USDA stamp is legible and does not cover any required label features or markings;
  8. Production dates within the range certified by the foreign inspection system, when the production dates are required by PHIS (e.g., period of ineligibility of country, establishment, product) at the time the application was submitted, or when the lot was received; and
  9. Weight expressed in terms of avoirdupois weight (e.g., pounds) or liquid (e.g., ounces) measure.

C. Immediate Containers (meat and poultry) - If the shipping containers contain fully labeled immediate containers, IPP are to verify that the immediate containers bear all of the mandatory label features, as required by 9 CFR 317.2 or 381.116.

NOTE: 9 CFR 301.2 defines the immediate container as “the receptacle or other covering in which any product is directly contained or wholly or partially enclosed.” If the product inside the box is not fully labeled, then the outside container (i.e., shipping container) is considered the immediate container and needs to bear all required labeling features of an immediate container including those stated in Section B above. Some features may not be included because of the type of product (e.g., if the product is fully cooked, it does not need safe handling instructions; if the product is not sold at retail and it does not bear a nutrient content claim, then it does not need nutrition labeling).

 Specifically, when verifying labeling, IPP are to verify that immediate container labels include the following required features:

  1. Name of product or descriptive designation of product;
  2. Ingredients statement, if the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients;
  3. Foreign establishment number (canned products must comply with 9 CFR 327.14(b)(2));
  4. Special handling statements, such as "Keep Frozen" or "Keep Refrigerated," if applicable;
  5. Net quantity of contents, if applicable;
  6. Manufacturer's or distributor's name and address;
  7. Nutrition labeling, if applicable;
  8. Name of the country of origin, preceded by the words "Product of." The phrase "Product of” is required on immediate containers of meat and poultry products; and
  9. Safe handling instructions for not-ready-to-eat (NRTE) meat and poultry products that have not undergone further processing that would render them ready-to-eat (RTE) and are destined for the consuming public.

NOTE: Exemptions to the safe handling instructions include imported products identified in writing by the applicant as for further processing at an FSIS official establishment (see Section F. below). IPP are to refer to 9 CFR 317. 2(l) and 381.125 for further information on safe handling instructions.

D. Protective Coverings - Note: Products inside shipping containers may be packaged or wrapped in protective coverings without mandatory labeling provided that the shipping containers include all mandatory labeling requirements for immediate containers as referenced in C. above.

If shipping containers contain product wrapped in protective coverings, IPP are to verify that the protective coverings meet the regulatory requirements in 9 CFR 317.1(a). Specifically, IPP are to verify that:

  1. Processed or prepared product packaged in protective coverings include a statement of limited distribution on the shipping container (e.g., “Packed for Institutional Use,” etc.) and that protective coverings bear no required labeling features; unlabeled product may not be removed from shipping containers for further distribution nor displayed or offered for sale.
  2. Unprocessed meat cuts packaged in protective coverings bear no required labeling features except that such protective coverings may bear the foreign mark of inspection with country of origin and the establishment number, although this is not required.
    • NOTE: Primal parts as defined in 9 CFR 316.9(b) are required to bear the foreign mark of inspection.
  3. Optional information is allowed on protective coverings, including:
    • a. Company brand names;
    • b. Trademarks; and
    • c. Code numbers.
  4. When any other mandatory labeling feature appears on a protective covering, IPP are to consider the protective covering an immediate container and verify that all regulatory requirements for labels on immediate containers are met (see paragraph C of this section).

E. Marked Carcasses and Primal Parts - When shipping containers hold carcasses or primal parts, IPP are to verify that the requirements of 9 CFR 316.9(b), 327.14(a), and 327.14(b)(1) are met by observing the carcass or primal part surfaces. The phrase "Product of” is not required on a carcass or primal or sub-primal cut that prominently displays the name of the foreign country within the marking itself. Products required to bear an inspection legend include: red meat carcasses, each primal part of a red meat carcass, beef liver, beef tongue, and beef hearts.

F. Unmarked Carcasses and Primal Parts (Intended Use) - If the shipping conveyance (e.g., truck, or other such container) contains unmarked carcasses or unmarked primal parts, IPP are to allow the movement of the product to an FSIS official establishment for further processing, provided the shipping conveyance or the individual shipping containers are sealed to prevent tampering or substitution of product. Specifically, IPP are to:

  1. Unless otherwise directed, allow an alternative to the sealing of the shipping conveyance such as tamper-proof sealing of shipping containers of unmarked carcasses or primal parts that bear the official inspection legend on the sealing (e.g. box tape) or wrap;
  2. Verify that shipping conveyances containing unmarked carcasses or primal parts are resealed after inspection;
  3. Verify that a company seal is placed on the truck or other conveyance containing carcasses or primal parts, and that the seal number is noted on the shipping documents or invoices;
  4. Refuse entry to any shipments of unmarked carcasses or primal parts that are not tamper-resistant sealed, or for which destination information is not provided. Fail the Label Verification TOI in PHIS; and
  5. Retain any shipment of unmarked carcasses or primal parts that arrive without tamper-proof sealing and notify the Front Line Supervisor (FLS) for further instructions.

G. Qualifier, Claims, Grade, or Declaration Concerns - If IPP have concerns regarding special nutrition claims, qualifiers, the use of grading terminology, or other declarations (e.g., “For Cooking Only,” “Not for Grinding”, “Certified Organic by…”), they are to retain the lot, use the Lot Tracking function in PHIS to select, place the lot on hold, and contact the FLS.

NOTE: All labels with claims or certifications must be evaluated by the Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD), LPDS prior to use. For labeling guidance available to industry see FSIS Labeling Policy Requirements.

H. Egg Products - IPP are to adhere to the following instructions for imported egg products when verifying labeling:

  1. Shipping Container - IPP are to verify that shipping containers bear the following information (required under 9 CFR 590.955):
    • a. Name of the product;
    • b. Name of the country of origin;
      • NOTE: The name of the country of origin may appear in the inspection mark. 
    • c. Foreign establishment number where the egg product was processed or packed;
    • d. Mark of inspection of the foreign country of origin;
    • e. Lot number or production code;
    • f. Weight expressed in terms of avoirdupois weight or liquid measure (e.g., lb., oz.); and
    • g. Shipping or identification mark identified on the foreign inspection certificate is on the shipping containers.
  2. Immediate Container and Placards on Tankers - IPP are to verify that the immediate container or any placard bears the following mandatory labeling features, as applicable (required under 9 CFR 590.950):
    • a. Name of product;
    • b. Name of the country of origin of the product, on packaged products preceded by the words “Product of” and plant number at which the egg product was processed or packaged;
    • c. Ingredient statement (for non-single ingredient items);
    • d. Manufacturer’s, packer’s, or distributor’s name and address;
    • e. Net quantity of content (net weight);
    • f. Inspection mark of the country of origin;
    • g. Date of production (production code); and
    • h. Handling statement such as “Keep Refrigerated” as required under 9 CFR 590.410(a)(1).

NOTE: Egg products from Canada or the Netherlands are not required to bear the official import inspection mark.

VII. LOT DISPOSITIONS

A. IPP that observe imported product that fails to meet labeling regulatory requirements are to fail the Label Verification TOI in PHIS except when missing, incorrect, or completely illegible shipping marks are observed. When IPP observe missing, incorrect, or completely illegible shipping marks, IPP are to fail the Certification TOI. When IPP fail the Label Verification TOI or Certification TOI in PHIS, an automatic refuse entry for the entire lot is triggered. IPP are to go to the Refused Entry screen and click on “Send to Applicant” to notify the applicant of the refusal with an automated e-mail. IPP are to retain the lots that fail the Label Verification TOI or Certification TOI pending an appeal or rectification by the applicant.

NOTE: The applicant may appeal the refused entry (9 CFR 327.24) or request the opportunity to correct the labeling noncompliance in writing to the FLS.

B. The applicant has 45 days for taking specified actions in response to product that has been refused entries as per 9 CFR 327.13(a)(2), 381.202(a)(2), or 590.945(a)(4).

C. IPP are to allow shipping or immediate container labels to be brought into compliance as follows:

  1. Non-Compliant Containers - For refused entry lots, the importer, applicant, or representative may request that the shipment be sorted to remove all non-complying containers. Non-compliant containers are to be refused entry until corrected. IPP are to retain this product.
  2. Labels - The importer may correct any label deficiency, except shipping marks, missing foreign government inspection legends, or foreign processing establishment numbers by stenciling or stamping and obliterating the incorrect markings and labels on all non-complying containers. IPP are to verify the correction. IPP are to charge the official import inspection establishment for this reimbursable service as per FSIS Directive 12,600.1, Voluntary Reimbursable Inspection Services.
    • NOTE: Hand written labels are not acceptable (9 CFR 317.2).​​​​​​​
  3. Movement to an Official Establishment - For refused entry product that is not properly marked (e.g., missing processing establishment number), or shipments refused entry for label defects on protective coverings, the applicant may request to the District Office (DO) to correct the noncompliance by diverting the product to an official establishment for further processing. If approved, IPP are to seal the conveyance with a USDA seal, complete FSIS Form 7350-1, Request and Notice of Shipment of Sealed Meat/Poultry, and distribute copies of the form as noted on the form. IPP should retain a copy of the form in the case file at the official import inspection establishment.
  4. Immediate Containers - The sorting or re-labeling of immediate containers is to be approved on a case by case basis by the DO, taking into consideration the importer’s written plan describing how the labels will be corrected.
  5. IPP are to bring any other requests to correct label noncompliance to the attention of the FLS for approval.

D. Procedures for Correcting Shipping Marks

  1. When IPP refuse a lot because they observe cartons with partial shipping marks where a portion of a shipping mark is missing or illegible, and the remaining identifying characters are the same as the shipping mark on the other containers in the lot, the importer may rectify the refused entry by sorting the defective cartons from the lot. The importer also has the option to rectify (re-apply or correct) the shipping mark by either re-labeling or by stenciling the complete shipping mark on all containers in which only part of the shipping mark is legible. This may be carried out by the official import inspection establishment without a representative of the foreign government.
  2. When IPP refuse a lot because there are containers on which the shipping mark is missing, completely illegible, or incorrect, the importer may rectify the refused entry by sorting the defective cartons from the lot. The importer also has the option to rectify (re-apply or correct) the shipping mark by either re-labeling or by stenciling the complete shipping mark on all containers. Do note, however, that for missing, incorrect, or completely illegible shipping marks, rectification must be approved and observed by a representative of the foreign government.
    • a. An official representative of the foreign inspection system may seek to obtain approval from the DO to re-certify and/or re-mark the product.
    • b. The official representative of the foreign inspection system is to present documentation to support re-certifying the product. This documentation may be a replacement inspection certificate or a letter on the foreign country letterhead.
    • c. If the DO decides to permit re-certifying and/or remarking of the product, it is to advise the official representative that they may coordinate with the official import inspection establishment to re-apply the shipping mark to the containers in accordance with FSIS label requirements under the supervision of IPP at the official import inspection establishment. IPP are to charge the official import inspection establishment for this reimbursable service as per FSIS Directive 12,600.1.

E. Procedures for Correcting Shipping Marks when Using Barcodes - FSIS permits official import inspection establishment personnel to apply the shipping mark to shipping units without having an official representative of the foreign inspection system on-site to approve and observe this activity, when FSIS IPP can verify the unique identifier within a barcode on the shipping unit using supporting documentation provided by the foreign country.

NOTE: These procedures apply only to countries that are eligible to use barcodes to verify missing or completely illegible shipping marks.

  1. When import inspection establishment management indicate they will utilize the barcode on the shipping unit to verify and apply the shipping mark, IPP are to:
    • a. Access the Import Inspection Operations (IIO) SharePoint site. If IPP do not have access to this site, they are to send an e-mail to importinspection@fsis.usda.gov to request access. IPP are to include “IIO SharePoint Access” in the e-mail subject line; and
    • b. Refer to the “Country Eligibility for Use of Barcodes” document on the IIO SharePoint site to determine whether the country is eligible to utilize barcodes to verify missing or completely illegible shipping marks.
  2. If the country is not listed on the IIO SharePoint site as eligible for the use of barcodes, IPP are to notify import inspection establishment management that the shipment is not eligible for the use of barcodes to rectify missing or completely illegible shipping marks, and refuse entry of the applicable shipping units.
  3. If the country is listed on the IIO SharePoint site as eligible for the use of barcodes, IPP are to verify that the foreign producing establishments name and number is on the country list. If the producing establishment number is on the country list, IPP are to review the examples of acceptable documentation available on the SharePoint site and based on these examples ensure that the documentation they have received is acceptable. If the producing establishment number is not on the country list, IPP are to notify import inspection establishment management that the shipment is not eligible for the use of barcodes to rectify missing or completely illegible shipping marks issues, and refuse entry of the applicable shipping units.
  4. When the foreign country and establishment are eligible for the use of barcodes to rectify missing or completely illegible shipping marks, IPP are to review documentation provided by the import inspection establishment management to verify that the shipping units are part of the lot identified on the foreign inspection certificate. Appropriate documentation would include:
    • a. A letter from the CCA attesting to the identification of the shipment; or
    • b. A report provided by the exporter that links the barcodes to the lot identified on the foreign inspection certificate.
  5. IPP are to verify that the barcode for each shipping unit matches the documentation provided. The numbers after the (21) identify the unique shipping unit number.
  6. IPP are to permit import inspection establishment personnel to apply the shipping mark to the shipping units if the documentation links the barcode to the foreign inspection certificate.
  7. IPP are to verify whether the shipping units have:
    • a. Been identified with the correct shipping mark and release the product; or
    • b. Not been identified with the correct shipping mark. IPP are not to release any shipping containers that have not been identified with the correct shipping mark.

NOTE: The IOR may still request to have a representative of the CCA certify and re-mark the product in the event the documentation does not link the barcodes to the foreign inspection certificate.

F. Verification of Corrected Lots - IPP are to observe the remarking. After the remarking is complete, IPP are to reinspect the lot following the procedures set out in Section V of this directive.

  1. IPP are to complete the disposition of the original lot in PHIS as outlined below:
    • a. If a new shipping mark is applied, or if the original shipping mark is re-applied to the noncompliant cartons from the original lot (and the remainder of the lot is inspected and passed and released into commerce):
      • i. Access the application and lot in PHIS and unlock the original application;
      • ii. In PHIS, copy the original lot from the original application, thereby creating a new lot for the remarked product with the original application. Adjust the shipping mark, number of containers, and net weight, as applicable. Save and submit the application;
      • iii. Access the application and new lot in PHIS. From the Lot Manager screen, receive the lot; and
      • iv. Access the application and the original lot in PHIS from the Lot Manager screen, select Refused Entry, and complete disposition (e.g., re-marked with new shipping mark) of the refused entry product.

b. If the original shipping mark is applied (shipping mark on original inspection certificate), and the entire lot or remainder of the lot is held pending the re-application of the shipping mark:

  • i. Access the application and lot in PHIS. From the Lot Manager screen, select Refused Entry and Rectification (e.g., re-marked with original shipping mark) of the refused entry product; and
  • ii. Perform any remaining reinspections on the lot.

VIII. HANDLING OF REFUSED ENTRY

IPP are to refer to FSIS Directive 9900.8, Meat, Poultry, and Egg Products Refused Entry Into The United States, for instructions on managing refused entry product.

IX. QUESTIONS

Refer questions regarding this directive to the OPPD Import and Export Policy Development Staff through askFSIS or by telephone at 202-690-4354.

Related Media

Related Document FSIS Directive 9900.5 Rev. 2
  • USDA.gov
  • USA.gov
  • Whitehouse.gov
  • About Us
  • Our Performance
  • Information Quality & Publishing Schedule
  • Visit OIG
  • FOIA
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Non-Discrimination Statement
  • Plain Writing
  • No FEAR
  • Significant Guidance

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • GovDelivery
  • Instagram
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Linked In
  • RSS
.

Start your search

Popular Topics

Recalls Import & Export FSIS Directives FSIS Guidelines Petitions