Skip navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Food Safety
    • Recalls & Public Health Alerts
      • Report a Problem with Food
        • Additional Recalls
      • Annual Recall Summaries
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2012
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2013
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2014
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2015
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2016
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2017
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2018
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2019
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2020
        • Summary of Recall Cases in Calendar Year 2021
        • Summary of Recall and PHA Cases in Calendar Year 2022
    • Food Safety Stats
      • Consumer Research
    • Foodborne Illness and Disease
      • Illnesses and Pathogens
        • Campylobacter
          • Campylobacter En Español
        • Clostridium botulinum
        • Escherichia coli O157:H7
        • Parasites and Foodborne Illness
        • Salmonella Questions and Answers
      • Resources for Public Health Partners
        • State Departments of Public Health
      • Outbreaks
        • Outbreak Investigations: Prevention
        • Outbreak Investigations: Response
    • Safe Food Handling and Preparation
      • Food Safety Basics
        • Additives in Meat and Poultry Products
        • Appliance Thermometers
        • Asar a la parrilla y seguridad alimentaria
        • Cleanliness Helps Prevent Foodborne Illness
        • Cooking for Groups
        • Cooking with Microwave Ovens
        • Cutting Boards
        • Deep Fat Frying
        • Doneness Versus Safety
        • Food Allergies
        • Glossary of Packaging Terms
        • Grilling Food Safely
        • Grilling and Food Safety
        • High Altitude Cooking
        • How Temperatures Affect Food
        • How to Find the USDA Establishment Number
        • Importing Meat, Poultry & Egg Products US
        • Inspection for Food Safety: The Basics
        • Irradiation and Food Safety FAQ
        • Keeping "Bag" Lunches Safe
        • Keeping Food Safe During an Emergency
        • Kitchen Thermometers
        • Mail Order Food Safety
        • Meat and Poultry Labeling Terms
        • Meat and Poultry Packaging Materials
        • Natural Flavors on Meat and Poultry Labels
        • Safe Handling of Take-Out Foods
        • Slaughter Inspection 101
        • Slow Cookers and Food Safety
        • Smoking Meat and Poultry
        • Tailgating Food Safety Q & A
        • Understanding FSIS Food Recalls
        • Water in Meat & Poultry
        • Danger Zone 40F - 140F
        • Food Product Dating
        • Freezing and Food Safety
        • Leftovers and Food Safety
        • Molds on Food: Are They Dangerous?
          • Hongos en los Alimentos: ¿Son Peligrosos?
        • Refrigeration
        • Safe Temperature Chart
        • Shelf-Stable Food
        • Steps to Keep Food Safe
        • The Big Thaw — Safe Defrosting Methods
        • The Color of Meat and Poultry
        • Washing Food: Does it Promote Food Safety?
        • Food Safety While Hiking, Camping & Boating
        • Seguridad Alimentaria Durante Caminatas, Campamentos y Paseos en Bote
      • Meat
        • Bacon and Food Safety
        • Bagre de la Granja a la Mesa
        • Beef From Farm To Table
        • Bison from Farm to Table
        • Carne de res ablandada mecánicamente
        • Catfish from Farm to Table
        • Color of Cooked Ground Beef as It Relates to Doneness
        • Corned Beef
        • Door-to-Door Meat Sales
        • Fresh Pork from Farm to Table
        • Goat from Farm to Table
        • Ground Beef and Food Safety
        • Hams and Food Safety
        • Hot Dogs & Food Safety
        • Jerky
        • Lamb From Farm to Table
        • Mechanically Tenderized Beef
        • Rabbit From Farm to Table
        • Roasting Those "Other" Holiday Meats
        • Sausages and Food Safety
        • Veal from Farm to Table
        • Yersiniosis and Chitterlings Tips
      • Poultry
        • Chicken From Farm to Table
        • Chicken Liver
        • Duck and Goose from Farm to Table
        • Hock Locks and Other Accoutrements
        • Is Pink Turkey Meat Safe?
        • Let's Talk Turkey Roasting
        • Poultry Processing: Questions & Answers
        • Poultry: Basting, Brining, and Marinating
        • Stuffing and Food Safety
        • The Poultry Label Says "Fresh"
        • Turduckens Require Safe Food Handling
        • Turkey Basics: Handling Cooked Dinners
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Cooking
        • Turkey Basics: Safe Thawing
        • Turkey Basics: Stuffing
        • Turkey from Farm to Table
        • Turkey: Alternate Routes to the Table
      • Eggs
        • Egg Products and Food Safety
        • Shell Eggs from Farm to Table
      • Emergencies
        • A Consumer's Guide to Food Safety: Severe Storms and Hurricanes
        • Fires and Food Safety
        • Keep Your Food Safe During Emergencies
        • Removing Odors from Refrigerators and Freezers
      • USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline
      • Brochures & Publications
    • Food Defense and Emergency Response
      • Emergency Response
      • Continuity of Operations (COOP)
      • Food Defense
        • Risk Mitigation Tool
        • Food Defense Considerations for Transportation of FSIS-Regulated Products
        • Food Defense Tools, Resources and Training
        • Functional Food Defense Plans
        • International Food Defense
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
          • Tables & Results Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat
          • Tables & Results: Microbiological Testing Program Pasteurized Egg Products
          • Aggregate Salmonella Categorization of Raw Chicken Parts, NRTE Comminuted Poultry, Young Chicken Carcass and Young Turkey Carcass Establishments Using Moving Windows
          • Salmonella Initiative Program Criteria
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Antimicrobial Resistance
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Raw Beef Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Ready-to-eat Products and Egg Products
            • Quarterly Sampling Reports on Salmonella
            • Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update
            • Salmonella Categorization of Individual Establishments for Poultry Products
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
          • Year-to-Date Totals: Testing of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)
          • Annual Report for STEC in Raw Ground Beef or Veal and Raw Ground Beef or Veal Components
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2017
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2018
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2016
          • Individual E. coli Positive Results for Raw Ground Beef (RGB) and RGB Components 2015
          • Year-to-Date 2018 Totals: Results of Raw Ground Beef Component (RGBC) Samples for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC):
        • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Chemical Residues and Contaminants
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • Journal Publications
  • Policy
    • Food Safety Acts
      • Federal Meat Inspection Act
      • Poultry Products Inspection Act
      • Egg Products Inspection Act
      • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
    • FSIS Guidelines
    • Directives & Notices
      • FSIS Notices
      • FSIS Directives
    • Petitions
    • Federal Register & Rulemaking
      • Federal Register Notices
      • Federal Register Rules
      • Executive Orders, Small Business Protection Laws & Other Guidance
      • Regulatory Priorities
    • Advisory Committees
      • National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI)
      • National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • 2021-2023 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
        • NACMCF 2022 Subcommittee
        • 2018-2020 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria For Foods (NACMCF)
  • Inspection
    • Inspection Programs
      • Inspection of Meat Products
        • Humane Handling Ombudsman
        • Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Poultry Products
        • Reducing Salmonella in Poultry
          • Pilot Projects: Salmonella Control Strategies
          • Proposed Regulatory Framework to Reduce Salmonella Illnesses Attributable to Poultry
            • Component 1
            • Component 2
            • Component 3
          • Salmonella By the Numbers
          • Salmonella KPI
          • Salmonella Risk Assessments
        • Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
      • Inspection of Egg Products
      • Inspection of Siluriformes
    • Compliance Guidance
      • Significant Guidance
      • HACCP
        • HACCP-Based-Inspection Models Project
          • New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS)
          • HIMP Redesign Achievement of Performance Standards Young Chicken Plants
          • List of HIMP Participating Plants
        • HACCP Validation
      • PHIS
        • PHIS: Historical Information
      • Retail Guidance
      • Small & Very Small Plant Guidance
        • Appealing Inspection Decisions
        • Food Safety Resources for Small and Very Small Plant Outreach: Order Form
        • Small Plant Help Desk
        • Small Plant Help Desk Form
      • Microbial Risk
        • Listeria Monocytogenes
        • Salmonella
        • Shiga Toxin-Producing E.Coli (STEC) and E. Coli O157:H7
        • Specified Risk Material
          • BSE Rules Being Strictly Enforced
        • Guidance for Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens - Best Practice Tips for Deli Operators
      • Specified Risk Material Resources
      • Food Safety Assessments Tools
      • Recall Process
      • Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide
      • Labeling
        • Basics of Labeling
        • Claims Guidance
        • Nonfood Compounds
          • Compounds Used for Construction and Repair in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Plants
          • Criteria Used by the Former Compounds and Packaging Branch for Evaluating Nonfood Compounds and Proprietary Substances
        • Ingredients Guidance
        • Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
          • Integration of Paper Label Applications into the Label Submission and Approval System (LSAS)
        • Labeling Policies
          • Human Food Made with Cultured Animal Cells
          • Regulations for Package Dating
          • Comprehensive List of Reasons for Label Modifications and Returns
        • Labeling Procedures
          • Information Required For Requesting a Temporary Approval
          • 10 Most Common Mistakes And How to Avoid Them
          • Label Submission Checklist
          • Labeling Situations That Can Not Have a Temporary Approval
          • Labeling and Establishment Responsibilities
          • Ten Most Commonly Asked Labeling Questions
          • Trans Fat Declarations in the Nutrition Facts Panel on Product Labeling
      • New Technology
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2003
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2004
        • Cooperative Agreements FY 2005
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2003
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2004
        • Food Safety Technologies FY 2005
        • NOL for Non-O157 STEC Test Methods
        • New Technology Information Table
      • Humane Handling
    • Import & Export
      • Import & Export Library
        • Eligible Foreign Establishments
        • U.S. Establishments by Country
          • Australia Eligible Establishments
          • Brazil Export Eligible Establishments
          • Egypt Export Eligible Establishments
          • Gibraltar Export Eligible Establishments
          • Israel Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Casings) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Japan (Cold Storage Facilities) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Mexico Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Beef) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Pork) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Poultry) Export Eligible Establishments
          • Russia (Prepared Products) Export Eligible Establishments
          • South Africa Eligible Establishments
      • Import Guidance
        • FSIS Import Procedures for Meat, Poultry & Egg Products
        • FSIS Import Reinspection
        • Sourcing Egg Products and Shell Eggs From Foreign Countries
      • Export Guidance
      • Equivalence
      • PHIS Components
      • International Reports
        • Foreign Audit Reports
        • Import and Export Data
    • Regulatory Enforcement
      • Humane Handling Enforcement
      • Quarterly Enforcement Reports
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v1)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v2)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v3)
        • Quarterly Enforcement Reports (Narrative, Archived v4)
      • FSIS Policies on Regulatory Decisions
    • Inspection Training & Videos
      • Inspection & Mission Training
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Videos
      • Regulatory Education Video Seminars
    • Apply for Grant of Inspection
      • Grants & Financial Options
    • State Inspection Programs
      • Cooperative Interstate Shipping Program
        • Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) Establishments
      • Guidance Documents for State and Local Agencies
      • States With and Without Inspection Programs
      • Reviews of State Programs
    • Establishments
      • FSIS Inspected Establishments
      • Meat, Poultry and Egg Product Inspection Directory
    • Inspection Forms
  • About FSIS
    • History
    • Leadership & Organizational Structure
    • Strategic Planning
      • FSIS Enterprise Governance Decision Making Process
    • Core Values
    • Food Safety & Agency Partners
      • Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
    • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
      • FSIS Adjudications
      • FSIS FOIA Reading Room
      • Frequently Requested Records
      • Making a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request
    • Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)
  • Contact Us
    • FSIS Offices
      • Office for Food Safety (OFS)
      • Office of the Administrator (OA)
      • Office of Field Operations (OFO)
      • Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit (OIEA)
      • Office of Public Health Science (OPHS)
      • Office of Policy and Program Development (OPPD)
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)
      • Office of International Coordination (OIC)
      • Office of Employee Experience and Development (OEED)
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
      • Office of Management (OM)
      • Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education (OPACE)
      • Internal Affairs (IA)
      • Office of Planning Analysis Risk Management (OPARM)
      • Civil Rights Staff
    • FSIS Department Emails
    • State Contacts
    • askFSIS
      • Having Trouble with the Webform
    • Pregúntele a Karen
  • Careers
    • Apply for a Job
    • Job Opportunities
    • Who Works for Us
      • Dr. Summer Addo — an Unexpected Career Path
      • Dr. Jeanetta Tankson Shares Her Passion for Science and Food Safety
      • Micheall Myrie - Visual Information Specialist and AAFE Award Winner
      • DDM Jeffery Jacobsen Ensures Meat is Safe and Cooks it, Too!
      • CSI Sherri Rodriguez: Thankful for FSIS and Friends
      • Stephen Whatley Celebrates 50 Years of Federal Service
      • Stevie Hretz Enjoys Putting “Humans First!”
      • Archives
    • Career Profiles
      • Administrative Positions
      • Compliance Investigator Positions
      • Consumer Safety Inspector
      • Food Inspector
      • Professional Positions
      • Public Health Veterinarian (PHV)
      • Scientific Positions
    • Incentives
      • Federal Employee Benefits Summary
    • Employment Programs
    • Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs
    • Professionals with Disabilities
  • News & Events
    • Events & Meetings
      • Officials' Calendar of Meetings
      • Food Safety Education Month
    • News & Press Releases
      • News Feeds & Subscriptions
    • Publications
    • Branding & Toolkits
  • Employees
    • HR Policies & Systems
      • Forms
      • Performance Management
      • Understanding Your Benefits
        • Emergency Backup Dependent Care (EBDC) Program
    • FSIS Safety
      • COVID-19 Pandemic Resources
        • Information about Face Coverings/Masks and Face Shields
      • Workplace Violence
    • Onboarding
      • New Hire Training
    • Agency Awards & Achievements
    • Professional Development Opportunities
      • OFO Workforce Investment Initiative Pilot Program
    • Employee News & Stories
      • FSIS Snapshots
        • March 2023 Snapshots
        • February 2023 Snapshots
        • January 2023 Snapshots
        • December 2022 Snapshots
        • September 2022 Snapshots
        • August 2022 Snapshots
        • November 2022 Snapshots
        • July 2022 Snapshots
        • October 2022 Snapshots
        • June 2022 Snapshots
        • May 2022 Snapshots
        • April 2022 Snapshots
        • March 2022 Snapshots
        • February 2022 Snapshots
        • January 2022 Snapshots
        • December 2021 Snapshots
        • November 2021 Snapshots
        • October 2021 Snapshots
        • September 2021 Snapshots
        • August 2021 Snapshots
        • July 2021 Snapshots
        • June 2021 Snapshots
      • Submit Your Stories
      • Black History Month — Resistance Through Agricultural Innovations
      • Tiffanie Newman: Versatility at FSIS and in Daily Life
      • Meet Pickle-Eating Champ, CSI Joe Smith
      • Supervisors Make All the Difference!
      • Disability: Part of the Equity Equation
      • Archives
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month - Cyber Security for Remote Work
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month: Occupant Emergency Planning
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Women’s Equality Day
        • ARCHIVE: Managing Heat Risk in Hot Weather
        • ARCHIVE: New Netflix Show Features USDA and FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month — Advancing Leaders Through Collaboration
        • ARCHIVE: Thank You for Your Public Service
        • ARCHIVE: World Veterinary Day — Recognizing the Resilience of FSIS Veterinarians
        • ARCHIVE: Two Hero Inspectors Provide Potentially Life-Saving CPR to a Plant Employee
        • ARCHIVE: Hero Inspector Saves a Life While on the Road
        • ARCHIVE: Administrative Professionals Day — Thank You
        • ARCHIVE: Chief Information Security Officer Marvin Lykes Recognized for Operational Excellence
        • ARCHIVE: Women’s History Month: Women Providing Healing, Promoting Hope
        • ARCHIVE: Alameda District Awards Petaluma Circuit Inspectors Recognition Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Collaborating in the Caribbean — Bringing Awareness About African Swine Fever
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Be an Advocate for Public Health
        • ARCHIVE: Message from Leadership — Honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
        • ARCHIVE: In Their Own Words: The 2021 Administrator’s Awards for Excellence Winners Speak Out
        • ARCHIVE: CSI Koffi Hoenou – From Togolese Teacher to U.S. Citizen
        • ARCHIVE: Dearborn, Mich., Circuit Inspectors Receive Collaborative Coins
        • ARCHIVE: Don’t Invite Foodborne Illness to the Party
        • ARCHIVE: Inspection for Ritual Meat and Poultry Slaughter
        • ARCHIVE: Thanksgiving Message from Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Make a Difference for You and Your Colleagues – Respond to FEVS by Dec. 3
        • ARCHIVE: American Indian/Alaskan Native Heritage Month — Together Towards Tomorrow
        • ARCHIVE: Federal State Audit Staff Twice Honored for Supporting Military Staff
        • ARCHIVE: Veterans Day Messages from FSIS Leadership
        • ARCHIVE: Food Inspector Apprenticeship Programs for Veterans
        • ARCHIVE: Disability Employment Awareness Month — America’s Recovery: Powered by Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Helping Today’s Inspectors Be Tomorrow’s Leaders with Tuition Reimbursement
        • ARCHIVE: Dr. Geraldine Vidal-Covas Embraces Her Hispanic Heritage, Encourages All
        • ARCHIVE: National Preparedness Month – Home Go Kits & Pets
        • ARCHIVE: Mask Requirements Updated for FSIS Employees
        • ARCHIVE: Modernizing Egg Inspection
        • ARCHIVE: FSIS Recognized Twice for 2020 Food Safety Education Efforts
        • ARCHIVE: Four Steps to Good Mental Health
        • ARCHIVE: Building Relationships at Work
        • ARCHIVE: Pride Month and USDA’s Commitment to Inclusion
        • ARCHIVE: Honoring the Dedicated Public Servants of FSIS
        • ARCHIVE: Asian American and Pacific Islander Contributions to Our Nation’s History
        • ARCHIVE: USDA Vaccination Heroes Do Their Part for America
        • ARCHIVE: Remembering Their Sacrifice: Jean Hillery, Tom Quadros and Bill Shaline
    • Facilities and Services
    • Employee Bargaining
    • Civil Rights

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • About FSIS
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • News & Events
  • Employees
  • Food Safety
  • Science & Data
  • Policy
  • Inspection
  • Recalls
  • Search
  • Full Menu
ALERT: Elkhorn Valley Packing Recalls Boneless… See more details
Page Hero
  • Science & Data
    • Research Priorities
    • Data Sets & Visualizations
      • Microbiology
        • Baseline Microbiology Data Reports
        • Microbiological Testing Program for RTE Meat and Poultry Products
        • Microbiological Testing Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)
        • National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)
        • Salmonella Verification Testing Program Monthly Posting
      • Chemical Residues and Contaminants
      • Humane Handling Data
      • Laboratory Sampling Data
        • Egg Product Testing, Years 1995-2017
      • Inspection Task Data
    • Scientific Reports
      • Public Health Regulations (PHR)
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2022
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2021
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2016
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2017
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2018
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2019
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2020
        • FSIS Data Analysis and Reporting: Public Health Regulations FY 2023
      • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC)
    • Laboratories & Procedures
      • Accredited Laboratory Program
        • Key Facts: ISO Accreditation
      • FSIS Laboratories
        • Requesting Bacterial Isolates from FSIS
    • Risk Assessments
    • Sampling Program
      • Raw Pork Products Exploratory Sampling Program
      • Sampling Results for FSIS Regulated Products
    • Journal Publications
Subscribe for Updates
Ask FSIS

askFSIS

Find answers to questions on inspection-related policies, programs, systems, and procedures.
Find An Answer

Salmonella Action Plan: A One and Two Year Update

One Year Update: January 2015

Preventing foodborne illness and protecting public health are the primary roles of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). The leading cause of foodborne illness in the United States is Salmonella. An estimated 1.2 million illnesses are thought to be caused every year by Salmonella, with approximately 360,000 Salmonella illnesses attributed to FSIS-regulated products in FY2014. After a decade in which there was little progress in bringing down the rate of illness from Salmonella, in 2012, the FSIS Administrator decided to take a new tack. He established the Strategic Performance Working Group (SPWG) to critically review data and to solicit and coordinate new ideas within the Agency on how to improve the Agency’s performance, and its first target was Salmonella.

On December 4, 2013, FSIS released its Salmonella Action Plan (the Plan) outlining the steps the Agency intended to take to address Salmonella in FSIS-regulated products. The Plan sets out the strategies that the SPWG had developed and identifies key areas for Agency improvement and specific supporting activities to achieve that improvement. The strategies include near-term and longer-term goals and activities.

FSIS is issuing this report to outline the Agency’s accomplishments during its first year of implementing the Plan and to preview the actions that the Agency intends to take in the coming year to reduce Salmonella illnesses and improve public health. Thus, this report demonstrates the Agency’s ongoing commitment to the plan.

1. Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection

FSIS identified changes to modernize the regulation of poultry slaughter and estimated that changes in these inspection activities are likely to result in a reduction of nearly 5,000 Salmonella illnesses per year in the United States.

Accomplishments

In August, 2014, FSIS published Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection; Final Rule in the Federal Register, announcing the New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS) and a tiered implementation plan for NPIS. The publication of the Final Rule in the Federal Register fulfilled the Agency’s commitment for this item.

On-Going Activities

FSIS is beginning the rule implementation process. Importantly, the Agency has begun implementing the requirements in the rule that establishments to do their own testing.

2. Sampling Related Activities

To ensure that FSIS’s sampling for Salmonella is in line with current and emerging trends in foodborne illness, FSIS committed to undertaking a number of actions consistent with the Agency’s data-driven approach to preventing illnesses.

Accomplishments

FSIS initiated a sampling program to estimate the national prevalence of Salmonella in comminuted poultry products. Data from this program are published in FSIS’s quarterly Salmonella report. In Fiscal Year 2014, FSIS gathered sufficient data to estimate national prevalence of Salmonella in comminuted poultry products for use in the development of performance standards. FSIS also initiated a sampling program for pork products at retail to begin evaluating Salmonella levels on different pork products. FSIS recently proposed performance standards for chicken parts and comminuted poultry in the Federal Register. (On January 21, 2015, USDA and FSIS announced that this proposal would be published.) Overall, 100% of the Agency’s commitments for the first year under the plan were met.

On-Going Activities

FSIS is continuing to sample comminuted poultry products at FSIS-regulated establishments and is using the data it collects to refine its inspection activities. In March 2015, the Agency plans to begin routine sampling of raw chicken parts as one of the several routine verification testing programs. Also in March 2015, FSIS intends to begin exploratory sampling of raw pork products. Moreover, in March, FSIS also intends to begin sampling imported poultry carcasses, imported raw chicken parts, and imported NRTE comminuted chicken and turkey for Salmonella and Campylobacter. These activities are part of FSIS’s on-going efforts to continually refine our sampling programs to better protect public health.

3. Develop New In-Plant Strategies

FSIS is working to ensure that its inspection resources are focused on the areas of greatest concern, while still assessing overall performance. Providing inspection program personnel with more information about an establishment’s performance will help to identify the areas of concern and will provide a strong foundation for enforcement actions should they be necessary.

Accomplishments

To better understand how establishments that produce comminuted poultry are addressing the problems that they confront, FSIS conducted Hazard Analysis Verifications (HAVs) in 258 of the 260 FSIS-regulated establishments that produce comminuted poultry. FSIS also began conducting Food Safety Assessments (FSAs) in all of these establishments. As of the beginning of November, FSIS had completed FSAs in 154 establishments that produce comminuted poultry. FSIS fulfilled 100% of the expectations for the first year under the plan.

On-Going Activities

The Agency is continuing to analyze HAVs and conduct FSAs in comminuted poultry operations. Analysis of the HAVs is ongoing. Additionally, FSIS is improving the training for its inspectors in poultry establishments. The Agency is also developing processes to better inform inspectors about an establishment’s performance characteristics.

4. Develop a Directive for Sanitary Dressing in Hogs

There is evidence from outbreak data that pork products contribute significantly to Salmonella illnesses. Decreasing contamination from poor sanitary dressing procedures in hog slaughter establishments will decrease the likelihood of Salmonella on hog carcasses. FSIS does not have a Directive for verification activities related to sanitary dressing in hog slaughter establishments.

Accomplishments

FSIS has developed a draft Directive for Hog Sanitary Dressings. The Agency is developing training materials before implementing the directive. Because the draft directive has not yet published, this goal is considered to be 75% complete for the first year under the plan.

On-Going Activities

FSIS will finalize and publish the Directive and implement appropriate training. Materials will be disseminated to all eligible IPP. The training will likely improve sanitary dressing and thereby reduce contamination and, presumably, illnesses.

5. Consider Modifying How we Post Salmonella Categories

Analyses done by FSIS show that posting information on the FSIS website on how plants are performing under the Salmonella carcass standards for young chickens led to improved control of this pathogen. This information is also valuable to companies that purchase chicken meat for further processing. Therefore, FSIS believes that making information about the performance of establishments available to the public will provides an incentive for industry to improve process control.

Accomplishments

In the Federal Register Notice that FSIS announced on January 21, 2015, on standards for chicken parts and comminuted poultry, FSIS is proposing to list the names of chicken slaughter plants in each performance category on its website. With the publication of the Federal Register Notice, the Agency has met its commitment for the first year under the plan.

On-Going Activities

FSIS continues to evaluate Salmonella results to assess the effectiveness of FSIS’s policies and identify ways to facilitate improvements for the industry.

6. Other Performance Standard Related Activities

Aligning FSIS Salmonella performance standards to Healthy People 2020 (HP2020) goals and focusing activities on improving the performance of establishments relative to those standards will move the agency closer to meeting these foodborne illness reduction goals.

Accomplishments

FSIS conducted risk assessments to identify performance standards targeted to meet the HP2020 Salmonella goals. On the basis of those results, the Agency is proposing—in the FRN announced on January 21, 2015—to establish, for the first time, performance standards for chicken parts and revised, more strict, performance standards for comminuted poultry. Those standards will use a continuous sampling, moving window approach that allows for an assessment of Salmonella prevalence in establishments. Most of the specific activities committed to in the Plan were achieved in FY2014. Thus, this goal is considered to be 100% complete for the first year under the plan.

On-Going Activities

In the next year, FSIS will review comments received on the FRN, make adjustments as necessary, and, unless convinced otherwise by the comments, implement performance standards for chicken parts and comminuted poultry.

7. Develop New Enforcement Strategies

FSIS continually evaluates inspection data to identify and refine enforcement strategies. Current efforts are focused on developing a robust systems approach that links all relevant data from an establishment to assess its overall performance. Because this goal did not contain any FY2014 activities, progress is noted in the chart below as “not applicable.”

8. Explore the Contribution of Lymph Nodes to Salmonella Contamination

Given that Salmonella can reside inside of lymph nodes, FSIS is exploring the potential contribution of lymph nodes to Salmonella levels in FSIS-regulated products.

Accomplishments:

FSIS partnered with other USDA agencies (the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)) and had discussions with industry to evaluate the potential contributions lymph nodes make to Salmonella contamination. FSIS and USDA’s Economic Research Service compared the percentage of positive Salmonella samples in ground beef purchased by AMS for the National School Lunch Program with other FSIS-inspected ground beef.[1] Although the percentage of samples that tested positive for Salmonella is significantly lower in the AMS-purchased ground beef compared to the other ground beef, the differences could not be directly attributed to the presence or absence of lymph nodes because of other confounding factors. Given the work completed but the inconclusive results of the analysis and the need to pursue the longer term activities described below, this goal is considered to be 75% complete for the first year under the plan.

On-Going Activities

FSIS continues to review information on how inspection and inclusion of different lymph nodes in ground beef affects Salmonella contamination in the product, including partnering with ARS to explore the potential public health impacts of Salmonella in lymph nodes. Findings will be incorporated into future revised slaughter guidance materials.

9. Pre-harvest Related Activities

Pre-harvest contamination can affect the level of Salmonella on FSIS-regulated products. Synthesizing information on pre-harvest interventions could help identify appropriate practices to decrease the prevalence or levels of Salmonella on FSIS-regulated products.

Accomplishments

Information about pre-harvest interventions was collected from previous public meetings and is included in the new draft of a guidance document under development that is entitled FSIS Compliance Guideline for Controlling Salmonella and Campylobacter in Raw Poultry. The document is in Agency clearance. A summary of pre-harvest related activities was developed and incorporated into guidelines rather than a separate publication. Hence, this goal is determined to be 50% complete for the first year under the plan.

On-Going Activities

The Agency will analyze the data it has gathered on pre-harvest activities and will evaluate whether it should recommend changes to pre-harvest practices to reduce Salmonella contamination. After obtaining clearance, FSIS will publish the revised FSIS Compliance Guidelines for Controlling Salmonella and Campylobacter in Raw Poultry.

10. Focus the Agency’s Education and Outreach Tools and Resources on Salmonella

FSIS has long maintained that new approaches or routes for providing Salmonella-related food safety messages to the public could help decrease Salmonella illnesses.

Accomplishments

In FY 2014, FSIS developed a two-part webinar series about food safety. Several hundred people attended the September 10, 2014, session during which food safety experts discussed common foodborne illnesses, specifically Salmonella. Additionally, the Agency continues to utilize FoodSafety.gov as an outreach tool. FSIS delivered a well-received Salmonella blog on FoodSafety.gov in 2014. In June 2014, the Agency conducted two Twitter chats about Salmonella. The Agency made great progress with webinars, blogs, and Twitter in 2014 but has not fully developed or provided the information through Food and Nutrition Service nutrition programs as committed to for the year. Thus, the goal is determined to be 75% complete for the first year under the plan.

On-Going Activities

FSIS is continuing to develop web resources addressing Salmonella and is identifying any existing web-resources that may require updating to maintain relevancy and accuracy. FSIS continues to work collaboratively with the USDA Food and Nutrition Service to expand outreach on food safety issues, especially Salmonella.

Progress made on the near-term goals was monitored using an ongoing tracking process and summarized by members of the SPWG. The results of this enumeration are illustrated in the chart below.

Salmonella Action Plan Progress During the First Year

Graph illustrating progress on 10 goals in the Salmonella Action Plan.

Summary

FSIS has made significant progress on the actions outlined in Plan in the year since its announcement. Bolstered by our progress, FSIS is re-affirming its commitment to the activities outlined in the Plan, which will ultimately decrease the number of Salmonella illnesses associated with FSIS-regulated products.

Two Year Update: February 2016

Preventing foodborne illness and protecting public health are the primary functions of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).  The leading cause of bacterial foodborne illness in the United States is Salmonella.  An estimated 1.2 million illnesses are thought to be caused every year by Salmonella, with approximately 375,000 Salmonella illnesses attributed to FSIS-regulated products in Fiscal Year (FY) 2015.  After a decade in which there was little progress in bringing down the rate of illness from Salmonella, the FSIS Administrator established the Strategic Performance Working Group (SPWG) in 2012 to critically review data and to solicit and coordinate new ideas within the Agency on how to improve the Agency’s performance.  Its first target was Salmonella.

On December 4, 2013, FSIS released its Salmonella Action Plan (hereafter referred to as the Plan), which outlined a list of priority near-term and longer-term actions developed by the SPWG that the Agency intended to take to address Salmonella in FSIS-regulated products.

This update summarizes accomplishments during the past two years.  Because most of the actions listed in the Plan have been completed or are nearing completion, FSIS will not provide future Plan-specific updates.  FSIS considers the Plan to have fulfilled its purpose of focusing FSIS’ Salmonella-related activities.  Any remaining actions will be completed through the regular course of the Agency’s work.  While the Agency prides itself on the completion of the activities detailed in the Plan, it also re-affirms its commitment to the goal of reducing Salmonella illnesses caused by FSIS-regulated products, and looks forward to building on the successes and progress achieved through the Plan.

1.   Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection

FSIS identified ways to modernize the regulation of poultry slaughter and estimated that changes in certain inspection activities are likely to result in a reduction of nearly 5,000illnesses per year in the United States attributed to Salmonella and Campylobacter.

2014 Accomplishments

In August, 2014, FSIS published Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection; Final Rule in the Federal Register.  The Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection regulation made the first major updates to U.S. poultry inspections in more than 50 years.  The new requirements mandate that all poultry companies take scientifically-based measures to prevent contamination, rather than addressing it after it occurs.  For the first time, poultry facilities will be required to perform their own microbiological testing to demonstrate that they are controlling for pathogens that cause illness, like Salmonella and Campylobacter.  When fully implemented, poultry companies will have to meet new control requirements for these bacteria.

This final rule promulgated the New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS) and an associated tiered implementation plan.  It also imposed new testing requirements on establishments and announced that enteric pathogens, such as Salmonella and Campylobacter, are hazards reasonably likely to occur in the poultry slaughter process.  The publication of the Final Rule in the Federal Register fulfilled the Agency’s commitment for this item.

2015 Accomplishments

FSIS implemented the requirement that all poultry slaughter plants perform indicator organism testing at two points in the production process. During 2015, establishments that had been in the HACCP Inspection Models Project (HIMP) began implementing the new inspection system.  All HIMP-establishments had successfully converted to NPIS by November 2015.  In addition, several non-HIMP-establishments also converted to the new inspection system in 2015.  With the implementation of this new inspection system, and the new recordkeeping and testing requirements, FSIS considers the Agency to have completed the actions in the Plan related to the modernization of the poultry slaughter system.  It is now up to industry to take actions to realize the full potential of this new program.

2.   Sampling Related Activities

To ensure that FSIS is sampling for Salmonella in line with current and emerging trends in foodborne illness, FSIS committed to undertaking a number of actions consistent with the Agency’s data-driven approach to preventing illnesses as outlined in its sampling plan.  These sampling initiatives enable FSIS to better assess the various types of meat and poultry products contributing to Salmonella illnesses and take steps to address the levels of Salmonella in those products.

2014 Accomplishments

FSIS initiated a sampling program to estimate the national prevalence of Salmonella in comminuted poultry products.  Data from this program are published in the FSIS quarterly Salmonella report.  In FY 2014, FSIS gathered sufficient data to estimate national prevalence of Salmonella in comminuted poultry products for use in the development of new performance standards.  FSIS also initiated a sampling program for raw pork products—with initial sampling beginning at retail—to evaluate Salmonella levels in different raw pork products.  Overall, 100% of the Agency’s commitments for the first year under the plan were met.

2015 Accomplishments

On January 26, 2015, FSIS proposed performance standards for chicken parts and comminuted poultry in the Federal Register.  FSIS reviewed public comments on the proposed performance standards for comminuted poultry and for chicken parts, and published final performance standards on February 4, 2016.  FSIS continued its comminuted poultry sampling program to monitor the industry until the performance standards were finalized and continued exploratory mechanically-separated poultry sampling with a program that began in June, 2015.  In addition, a sampling program for chicken parts (legs, breasts, and wings) began in March, 2015.  FSIS plans to begin exploratory sampling of additional types of chicken parts, as well as religious-exempt and low-volume establishments, which were formerly excluded from Agency sampling.

In May 2015, FSIS continued its exploratory sampling program for various types of raw pork products, with sampling conducted in Federally-regulated establishments.  FSIS is continuing to collect raw pork products to assess Salmonella level in raw pork products (other than carcasses) for the first time. The Agency will analyze the data from this exploratory program to consider whether performance standards are warranted on the basis of these results.  In order to continually improve its sampling programs, FSIS also developed a five-year sampling plan that identified gaps and exceptions in FSIS sampling programs.  FSIS plans to publish the five-year sampling plan on its website early in Calendar Year (CY) 2016. Through all of the above accomplishments and with the publication of its sampling plan, FSIS will consider this goal to be 100% complete.

3.   Develop New In-plant Strategies

FSIS has been working to ensure that its inspection resources are focused on the areas of greatest concern in a given establishment, while still assessing its overall performance.  FSIS is committed to providing inspection program personnel (IPP) with more information to help them identify areas of concern and to provide a strong foundation for enforcement actions should they be necessary.

2014 Accomplishments

To better understand how establishments producing comminuted poultry are addressing the problems that they confront, during 2014 FSIS conducted Hazard Analysis Verifications (HAVs) in 258 of the 260 FSIS-regulated establishments that produce comminuted poultry.  FSIS also began conducting Food Safety Assessments (FSAs) in all of these establishments.  As of November 2014, FSIS had completed FSAs in 154 establishments that produce comminuted poultry.  FSIS fulfilled 100% of the expectations for the first year under the plan.

2015 Accomplishments

In 2015, FSIS completed FSAs in all the remaining establishments that produce comminuted poultry.  FSIS also began conducting HAVs, similar to those that were performed the previous year, once per quarter at establishments.  The results of the HAVs were analyzed to determine noncompliance rates for these tasks.  FSIS also made available report in the Public Health Information System (PHIS) that allows inspectors and industry users to generate a summary of an establishment’s performance on public health regulations (PHR) for any given month, allowing inspectors and industry to be better informed about an establishment’s performance characteristics.  In addition, the Public Health Risk Evaluation (PHRE) tool was launched.  The PHRE tool is used by Enforcement, Investigations and Analysis Officers (EIAOs) to broadly assess establishments and determine whether a FSA or an enforcement action may be warranted, based on sampling and inspection data in PHIS.  Thus, FSIS considers the obligations of this goal to have been fully met.

4.   Develop a Directive for Sanitary Dressing in Hogs

Foodborne illness outbreak data indicates that pork products contribute significantly to Salmonella illnesses.  Decreasing contamination from poor sanitary dressing procedures in hog slaughter establishments will decrease the likelihood of Salmonella contaminationon hog carcasses.  FSIS does not have a Directive for verification activities related to sanitary dressing in hog slaughter establishments.

2014 Accomplishments

In 2014 FSIS developed a draft Directive for Hog Sanitary Dressing.  The Agency began developing training materials to implement before finalizing and issuing the directive.  Because the draft directive had not yet published, this goal was considered to be 75% complete for the first year under the plan.

2015 Accomplishments

Through developing the draft directive, FSIS found it necessary to reevaluate the best inspection methods and activities for FSIS in-plant personnel in hog slaughter facilities.  The Agency continues to shape those methods and activities and to determine how to best convey the information to employees.  Although the specific actions related to this item have shifted slightly, the Plan served its purpose by focusing Agency attention on potential Salmonella contamination on hog carcasses using illness data as an indicator, despite the low percent positives recorded in earlier hog carcass sampling programs.  The Plan provided the impetus for future improvements to hog slaughter inspection.  The Agency considers this goal to be 100% complete.

5.   Consider Modifying How FSIS Posts Salmonella Categories

FSIS analyses indicated that posting information on the FSIS website on individual establishment performance under the Salmonella carcass standards for young chickens led to improved control of the pathogen.  This information is also valuable to companies that purchase chicken meat for further processing.  Therefore, FSIS believes that making information about the performance of establishments publically available will provide an incentive for industry to improve process control.

2015 Accomplishments

In its January 26, 2015 Federal Register Notice (FRN)—in addition to proposing standards for chicken parts and comminuted poultry—FSIS proposed listing the names of chicken slaughter plants in each performance category on its website.  FSIS continues to evaluate Salmonella results to assess the effectiveness of FSIS policies and identify ways to facilitate improvements for the industry.  The Agency considers this goal to be 100% complete.

6.   Other Performance Standard Related Activities

Aligning FSIS Salmonella performance standards to Healthy People 2020 (HP2020) goals and focusing activities on improving the performance of establishments relative to those standards will move the Agency closer to meeting these foodborne illness reduction goals.

2014 Accomplishments

FSIS conducted risk assessments to identify performance standards targeted to meet the HP2020 Salmonella goals.  FSIS made significant progress toward achieving this element of the plan in FY2014.  

2015 Accomplishments

On the basis of the advances made in 2014, the Agency proposed—in the January 26, 2015 FRN —establishing inaugural performance standards for chicken parts and revising the performance standards for comminuted poultry to make them stricter.  Both of those standards, if implemented, will rely on continuous sampling that would allow for an assessment of Salmonella prevalence as well as routine monthly verification sampling in establishments, replacing the previous set-based sampling program which only collected samples at establishments for a specific number of consecutive days with a year or more between sets.  As stated above, FSIS reviewed public comments on the proposed performance standards for comminuted poultry and for chicken parts, and published final performance standards on February 4, 2016 and considers the action to be 100% complete.

7.   Develop New Enforcement Strategies

On a continual basis, FSIS evaluates inspection data to identify and refine enforcement strategies.  Current efforts are focused on developing a robust systems approach that links all relevant data from an establishment to assess its overall performance.

2014 Accomplishments

This goal did not contain any FY2014 activities.

2015 Accomplishments

FSIS has been developing best practice and guidance documents for the meat and poultry industry to develop a robust systems approach for assessing an establishment’s performance.  On September 4, 2015, FSIS published the veal slaughter guidance document, “Sanitary Dressing and Antimicrobial Implementation at Veal Slaughter Establishments: Identified Issues and Best Practices.”  This document was developed to address STEC issues in veal, but it also contains recommended best practices that help mitigate Salmonella.  FSIS published the revised “FSIS Compliance Guidelines for Controlling Salmonella and Campylobacter in Raw Poultry” on December 11, 2015.  In addition, the guidance document, “Compliance Guidelines for Minimizing the Risk of STEC and Salmonella in Beef (including Veal) Slaughter Operations,” has been submitted for review and should be published in FY2016.  Publication of this document will complete this action item.

8.   Explore the Contribution of Lymph Nodes to Salmonella Contamination

Because Salmonella can reside inside of beef lymph nodes, FSIS is exploring the potential contribution of lymph nodes to Salmonella contamination in FSIS-regulated products.

2014 Accomplishments

FSIS partnered with other USDA agencies – the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) – and conducted discussions with industry to evaluate the contributions that lymph nodes make to Salmonella contamination.  FSIS and the USDA Economic Research Service (ERS) also compared the percentage of positive Salmonella samples in ground beef purchased by AMS for the National School Lunch Program with other FSIS-inspected ground beef.  Although the percentage of samples that tested positive for Salmonella is significantly lower in the AMS-purchased ground beef compared to the other ground beef, confounding factors made it impossible to directly attribute differences to the presence or absence of lymph nodes.  Given that the work was completed, but the results of the analysis inconclusive, this goal was considered to be 75% complete for the first year under the plan.

2015 Accomplishments

FSIS continued to review information on how inspection and inclusion of different lymph nodes in ground beef affects Salmonella contamination in the product.  Current activities include partnering with ARS to explore the potential public health impacts of Salmonella in lymph nodes.  As FSIS is considering options for modernization of beef and swine slaughter, the Agency is also discussing how to decrease the potential for contamination from lymph nodes.  In addition, FSIS is considering increasing the sampling of “other” ground beef components, such as head meat and cheek meat, and possible targeting of lymph nodes in certain situations.  Data from this increased sampling will allow FSIS to better understand how Salmonella potentially residing within lymph nodes may affect the contamination of raw ground beef.  Moreover, the guidance document, “Compliance Guidelines for Minimizing the Risk of STEC and Salmonella in Beef (including Veal) Slaughter Operations,” planned for publication in 2016 contains several recommendations concerning lymph nodes.  These recommendations include removal of major carcass lymph nodes, applying treatment to heads after lymph nodes have been incised to address potential contamination, and sending head and cheek meat for cooking or other full-lethality treatment (e.g. high pressure processing or irradiation).  Given these developments, FSIS considers it has completed the lymph node-related actions in the Plan.

9.   Pre-harvest Related Activities

Pre-harvest contamination can affect the level of Salmonella on FSIS-regulated products.  Synthesizing information on pre-harvest interventions could help identify appropriate practices to decrease the prevalence or levels of Salmonella on FSIS-regulated products.

2014 Accomplishments

Rather than developing a stand-alone document, information about pre-harvest interventions that could reduce the incoming Salmonella load was collected from previous public meetings and included in a draft guidance document developed in 2014.  By the end of 2014, the document was in Agency clearance and this action was determined to be 50% complete for the first year.

2015 Accomplishments

After incorporating changes through clearance process, including pre-harvest interventions, FSIS published the revised FSIS Compliance Guidelines for Controlling Salmonella and Campylobacter in Raw Poultry on December 11, 2015.

As part of its ongoing efforts to reduce Salmonella, FSIS will continue to analyze the data that becomes available in the literature on pre-harvest activities, and it will evaluate whether to recommend further changes to pre-harvest practices to reduce Salmonella contamination.  FSIS considers its commitments to pre-harvest related activities under the Plan to be 100% complete.

10. Focus the Agency’s Education and Outreach Tools and Resources on Salmonella

FSIS has long maintained that new approaches or routes for providing Salmonella-related food safety messages to the public could help decrease Salmonella illnesses.

2014 Accomplishments

In 2014, FSIS developed a two-part webinar series about food safety.  Several hundred people attended the September 10, 2014 session during which food safety experts discussed common foodborne illnesses, specifically Salmonella.  Additionally in 2014, the Agency continued to utilize FoodSafety.gov as an outreach tool, including creating and posting to a well-received Salmonella blog on the web site throughout the year.  The Agency also conducted two Twitter chats about Salmonella in June.  FSIS worked with the Ad Council to develop 15- and 30-second public service announcements (PSAs) (TV and radio, English and Spanish) and digital advertising to specifically address Salmonella.  The ads positively influenced proper thermometer use.   Although the Agency made great progress with webinars, blogs and Twitter in 2014, it did not fully develop or provide information through the USDA Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) nutrition programs as it committed to do in 2014 in the Plan.  Thus, this action was determined to be 75% complete for the first year under the plan.

2015 Accomplishments

In 2015, FSIS worked with the Ad Council to develop short instructional videos explaining the science behind USDA food safety recommendations, and how pathogens, such as Salmonella, affect day-to-day life.  FSIS also published an infographic in collaboration with ERS that shows the economic impact of Salmonella, the food vectors for Salmonella outbreaks, the symptoms of salmonellosis, and how to prevent salmonellosis.  This infographic was shared via social media in March 2015 and through FoodSafety.gov.  In addition, FSIS worked with Women, Infant and Children (WIC) Centers in multiple states to develop tool kits that will help WIC recipients understand more about food safety and foodborne illnesses, including Salmonella.  FSIS is continuing to develop web resources addressing Salmonella and is identifying any existing web-resources that may require updating to maintain relevancy and accuracy.  FSIS plans to continue these outreach efforts, but considers this action item on the Plan to be 100% complete.

Summary

FSIS has completed nearly all of the activities listed in Salmonella Action Plan at this time, and most items that remain are in very late stages of completion, such as final document clearance with likely publication dates in 2016.  FSIS therefore considers that it has accomplished the commitments made in the Plan, which are the groundwork for improved inspection, production practices, and education.
Through these actions and accomplishments, FSIS has achieved its main objective in developing the Plan: to better focus Salmonella-related activities with a long-term goal of reducing Salmonella illnesses.  A number of the items in the plan are not one-time actions, but are changes that the Agency implemented in how it will conduct its business going forward.  The Agency anticipates that the Plan will have long-lasting effects to reduce Salmonella illnesses.  FSIS realizes that the Plan has not resulted in and could not have resulted in the elimination of Salmonella illnesses. Although the Agency will no longer monitor its accomplishments against the Plan, it will continue to explore and evaluate new approaches and methods to decrease Salmonella illnesses and will continue to monitor its progress through the number of Salmonella illnesses associated with FSIS-regulated products.

Related Resources

Food safety journal covers

Journal Publications

FSIS research and findings are published in peer-reviewed journals.
Learn More
Import inspector at work

Quarterly Enforcement Reports

Review the enforcement actions FSIS has taken to ensure that consumers have access to safe, wholesome and properly labeled products.
Learn More
Woman inspects pork as it goes through processing

Humane Handling Enforcement

Contains official notifications of enforcement actions and restarts when the establishment has demonstrated regulatory compliance.
Learn More
Last Updated: Oct 21, 2020
  • USDA.gov
  • USA.gov
  • Whitehouse.gov
  • About Us
  • Our Performance
  • Information Quality & Publishing Schedule
  • Visit OIG
  • FOIA
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Non-Discrimination Statement
  • Plain Writing
  • No FEAR
  • Significant Guidance

Food Safety and Inspection Service

  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • GovDelivery
  • Instagram
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Linked In
  • RSS
.

Start your search

Popular Topics

Recalls Import & Export FSIS Directives FSIS Guidelines Petitions